Here’s a better question: when are you going 4k?
1 Like
And that’s where you’d be wrong sir.
Smin’s a Brit, he should be GETTING A TEA
So they Python 4 could come soon?
He admitted he likes coffee. He’s an engineer, of course he likes coffee
I just want to see the trailer. I can’t bear this week anymore and can’t wait to see the two loongs in China :)
This is the 6th year of waiting. Waiting these missing vehicles in Japanese naval tech tree:
IJN Takao (1944/45), IJN Maya (1944), IJN Atago (1941), IJN Ashigara (1941), IJN Kagero (1941), IJN Yukikaze (1945), IJN Shiratsuyu (1943), IJN Fubuki (1928), IJN Hibiki (1944), IJN Kitakami (1941), IJN Ōyodo (1944), IJN Tenryū (1942), IJN Akikaze (1943), IJN Hiei (1942), IJN Yahagi (1945), IJN Fuyutsuki (1945)
3 Likes
Probs 2025. From my knowledge python 4 has no loal and no iir seeker. Duel band seeker and nuts flight performance. Same thing with aim9x. It has iir seeker but no loal. So there is a bit of a transition between next gen missiles like irist and p5 that have full sphere capabilities. Or things like mica or asraam that can guide the target using tws lock similar to a fox 3
The European storm and French wind are what you should be looking forward to.
2 Likes
Dosent Japan already have one of the best naval trees. I feel like IJN tree has most love given when it comes to naval
J10B and J11B will actually be strong and competitive too
1 Like
But I didn’t study the French and German/British tech trees, so, I can only expect them to appear as opponents? Anyway, they’re good, but I’d like to see mine :D
2 Likes
The Python 4 from datamines has both seeker shutoff and gate width narrowing IRCCMs, as well as (I believe) 50gs of pull, though no TVC, and the range and acceleration of the Python 3. So, while it would be the best in game by a fairly large margin, it wouldn’t be overpowered, really.
I know. The J-11B is my favourite Flanker, in fact.
Yeah, in reality I reckon it would get a dual band (ir and UV) seeker but I don’t think gaijing models UV shadows just yet. I don’t think they will add this mechanic for a small amount of missiles so I think they will just add a compromise
I might want gajin decompression max battle rating to 14.3 before add new generation infrared Air-to-Air Missile of fighter aircraft top tier in the future
To replace magic II on Mirage 2000D RMV, and increase BR to 13.3 or 13.7 someday
For Mirage 2000-5F, decompression max BR to 14.0 before received MICA IR
1 Like
I have a thing for 2 seat flankers, J16 and su30. Idk I just like 2 seater aircraft, for looks wise of course
1 Like
Missiles like the ASRAAM and later AIM-9X models you are referring to are generally viewed as a later generation than the ones I was asking about.
For example, the earliest production version of the AIM-9X (the Block 1 model) was just an AIM-9M’s seeker & warhead with thrust vectoring and new fins.
Don’t you want to try to make positions for artillery, outside the tank map, something like, near airfields? So that players can use artillery to shoot along a mounted trajectory. They will be destroyed with the help of aviation
This update brings Thailands air forces. But we dont rule out some ground vehicles being possible in the future. Just nothing to announce for now.
10 Likes