It’s the people who only play a single nation by choice (people just not having time to grind a second nation is actually a fair reason) that usually post the stupid takes here. So I’m just going to call them out, sorry if it hurts their feelings.
Nvm he’s being serious. I thought he was joking. So he believes a plane that never punched any of their air forces belongs to said nations… but t90s should have gone to USSR.
Might get a gold medal with this routine at the Olympics.
Took me a bit to realize this was bait when I saw you replying to someone. I was about to lose it over t90 to Russia(I agree) but then the same logic not being applied to the U.S. plane lol
@Smin1080p_WT Can we expect devblog today? It’s already only two weeks before Christmas, and unless Gaijin will mess dev-server with opening less than a week or give up their Christmas Vacation, they need to start dev-season this week.
except that either system would fill up half the map to function
both need:
one or more launcher vehicles (emplaced)
one Radar vehicle (emplaced)
one command Container/Vehicle (emplaced)
there is no combined version and they can not only not fire on the move but have to be fully set up to fire
this type of system isn’t sth that you just have follow your Motorised infantry units like a Gepard or Shilka, this is a serious logistical effort that takes planning and time to set up
those aint SPAAs, they’re Anti Air Missile batteries that require distance to the front to survive and function
So as a stop gap what if they where behind the airfield aways so they didn’t reach into the map…maybe set them so they only give 15km coverage past the front of the airfield. Until they make the maps much bigger???
if current CAS(12km moving target lock and 20km ground lock) don’t update, 20km SPAA is enough, and it’s better to be FNF. like Spyder, Sky Sabre, SL-AMRAAM, Type 625E, blabla
now we are close at Type 625E, hope we can get a full capality one with FB-10A