The game applies differential treatment to vehicles from different nations. At identical battle ratings, inconsistent weapon configurations and armour protection values are assigned. Incorrect reference data is sometimes enforced to achieve so‑called “realism‑based balancing”.
The standard appears to be double‑sided: realism is cited when balance adjustments are desired, while balance arguments are used when historical accuracy is required. Could you please maintain better business integrity?
In the case of Germany’s Leopard 2A7 and Leopard 2A8, erroneous reference materials have been adopted, resulting in intentional nerfs.
When Chinese‑region players submit correct supporting documents, these submissions are ignored, and players’ reasonable requests go unanswered.
Is this the realistic gameplay your game advertises? Your promotional claims seem laughable in light of these practices. Please allow players’ legitimate demands to be heard.
It appears you only select evidence favourable to yourselves from materials provided by players to carry out your so‑called balancing.strong text