No worries, yes this is the one that should be used. Moreover, it’s just incorrect for now. e’ll have to see if they fix it.
It could act just like the Stridsvagn 122B PLSS’s commander sight/periscope.
Gunner sight placement is bugged atm
Is the current 81C placeholder thing actual missile or just the picture still 81C.
IDK but the stats are right correct? just the name is still 81C.
Not at all
Another bug: The hitbox/modules doesn’t adjust when retracting. As you see on the screenshot, the decorations (bushes), as well as the modules-view (blue) shows everything at the unretracted location and when I asked teammates to shoot the zone of the bushes, there were the impact sparks popping up.
Thats still wip dw
I mean not the same as 81C right? The actual stats are up to Gaijin. I mean up to this point CSSA5 still got HN6 which is a 12G missile.
Hello, I wanted to ask, do you think the Spyder (and other vehicles) should be able to not have the launcher up when they stop? I just thought about it and you could get you missiles shot if the launcher peeks up from a hill.
Also, does the report on the zoom include the max zoom issue? As in GSB, the camera is zoomed in to the maximum and it now has the radar covering half the screen.
The Type 81C placeholder is actually the Python 5, as shown in sensor view.
Unfortunately it’s not looking great, the missile doesn’t seem to hit anything less than 3km from you, which is insane.
The Python 5 can handle more than 50Gs but from my few plays with the stats currently given to it in the Dev it doesn’t go any further than 20G.
It is still work in progress. Once it’s renamed Python 5 and still has similar issues, I’ll just bug report it. Already got the files ready
Awesome Sauce. It’s painful seeing the capabilities of the IRIS-T and then seeing my python 5 not pulling even the slightest.
yea i notice the same thing i does not even pulling 1/4 of what it should pull pretty unrealistic the Performance of the Python-5 it should be on par with the IRIS-T