I don’t think it’s fair to compare the Soviet Spitfire Mk Vb with the Yak-9T or Yak-9K, since they were designed for entirely different roles and purposes.
Besides, the USSR lacks solid 4.0 options for Air Arcade Battles, and this could be one potential solution.
If the soviet tree didnt have such a diverse amount of aircraft with such favourable flight models and BR placements id fully back it, however that isnt the situation the tree is in
Dammit, I really want to see our beautiful spitfire in soviet tt too. Because sharing things is good, And it will be a perfect event/battle pass reward.
But I just can’t find where we need to place her.
Soviet TT are just way too solid and I can’t find a gap for her.
:'(
There’s nothing wrong with adding more content like this, even if the gap is already filled.
Some people get really dogmatic about what should or shouldn’t be added, which seems silly to me. After all, we’re not the ones making the decisions about what gets developed and added in the game.
This could be a low-priority addition that might eventually arrive in the future if War Thunder starts running out of content ideas.
I think this discussion belongs elsewhere, since this aircraft isn’t only relevant to air simulator battles. You should submit it as a separate suggestion, probably.
You might change this - as it is not correct in 2 aspects:
Lend-Lease
Lend-Lease aircraft are determined as aircraft provided by the US to allies from 1941 until August 1945 (then the Lend-Lease Act ended).
In addition we have so called reverse Lend-Lease by the UK (planes for the US) and something similar from Canada (for the UK).
The Empire was broken, these were regular exports - to be paid by the USSR. I have no data if, when and how they were paid, but calling them Lend-Lease is not correct.
Lend-Lease existed from November 41 till August 45. Mainly as the US government was forced to find a way around export restrictions (like the previous cash & carry legislation) - which represented actually the will of the US citizens to stay out of trouble in Europe.
Contribution / impact of the VB to the VVS
If you consider that we talk about ~ 150 aircraft (most of them 2nd hand) and they have not gained any remarkable impact, they played zero role.
Nevertheless i up-voted this suggestion as i have read various times about Spitfire kill claims of LW pilots in their memoirs or biographies, but mostly for a short period in 43.
As a side note:
The clear and undisputed inferiority of the Vb vs a plain Fw 190 A-3 or A-4 is not modelled within wt - thanks to various nerfs of 190s the roles are switched.
So it is a bit strange to argue with (non-existent) historical significance as justification for a possible implementation when wt is unable or unwilling to provide accurate flying / fighting experiences of already implemented aircraft.
Like @Real_K_Soze said, they were basically given to the USSR after extensive first hand use.
By that time the aircraft was severely outclassed by Bf 109s and Fw 190s.
I‘m all for having Soviet „lend lease“ vehicles in the Russian tech tree.
If the game had that kind of detail I’d be ok with it, but it’s just another statistic they need to look at to balance vehicles, probably not a good idea.