Proofs of it ever working?
idk, i find all of them pretty decent. KV-7 is great with KV-1E and T-34E in lineup, TOG is good enought on small maps, and every kill with sturmtiger gets me so much hysterically laughing that i cant make myself feel bad about that tank xD
It’s British.
MB-326K
This Hawk is the Hawk 200, looks like the prototype version.
So it’d be going to Britain.
Summary ( by @AblativeKitten )
Is it tho? The one in trailer had, i think, Indonesian markings. ANd indonesia now is Japanese subtree material
trailer one
briish one
Yes, that one. Goes to italy?
if thats so… thats somehow better
The Hawk could go to Germany. It was used by the Swiss airforce.

This is a low-vis RAF roundel iirc

hey, thats my shoulder

object: 248, 120, 268, 140, 279, 292, 775, 435, 685 (btw is-7 is an experimental tank so is T72M2 moderna) so pls shut up about Russians not reciving any experimental tanks, they don’t need any
The alternative was introduce a new feature where internals could be upgraded via modifications (I believe they did a little of this with the Su-24?) OR introduce the same jet again (albeit with 1-2 differences so it’s “same same but different”) which they’ve likely done here…
Unless, of course, 12-16 AMRAAM? 👀
No thanks, US players need to get better at using their missiles, not just be handed more of them
Meanwhile USSR players firing 3+ R-77-1 at one player:
Didn’t make their WR go up tho to have that many r77-1
I don’t think that’s particularly fair either, especially now that the R-77-1 is equal to the AMRAAM, top amount of missiles per aircraft should never go over 10 per aircraft in ARB, because when you start multiplying those ridiculous missile counts by the team sizes, top tier becomes a ‘who has the most chaff’ dick measuring contest
It is still a Flanker end of day and most of the time they’re facing teams with France on them so you won’t see much of a spike there anyways.
I suspect the “win rate” of USSR will obviously skyrocket when the Su-35 comes.
Change the reload of the t-90M to 6.5 seconds
Ahistorically, no thanks





