Would be cool to see those, but Gaijin probably isn’t going to add them.
I don’t know of any specific subsonic plane that definitely could carry all-aspect missiles for Germany or France, but as with many other things, sometimes nations just don’t have vehicles to fill certain niches.
I’ve seen Aermacchi MB-326K in the trailer, I hope it will be added at full potential with Magics and AS.12, no need to limit its capabilities as there are other MB-326 variants for lower BRs.
Also please don’t make it just a premium, Italian air tree is seeking for new unique additions. There can be 2 Italian MB-326K, one premium and one regular.
Indeed. Ever since the Alpha jet was added and especially in the year of no aircraft (2023) it would have been perfect.
Kinda a shame though this seems to be a Sea Harrier FRS1 side-grade rather than the version with a mini F-16A radar and Skyflash DFs. But its a good addition either way. Has 2x Internal 25mm ADENs which are an awesome gun set up and it should be a solid CAS for 10.7
Show me evidence that it exists without showing me the mock-up/concept image.
I have the patent for it, it’s only ever been a nonfunctional concept.
VKS uses double racks only on Su-35S. There is no photos or any proof that any other Flanker can use those.
Most nations either don’t have Mavericks or only TV Mavericks at the BRs that the MiG-27, Su-24 and Su-17M4 sit at
More pylons but only 10 of them can use RVV-AE, R-73E, R-27.
less pylons than Su-30SM, no?
Su-35 and Su-30SM use the same exact centerline hard points while having extremely similar fire control computers.
There is no evidence of exclusive operation, and the manufacturer claims Su-30 and Su-35 at minimum.
Su-30SM isn’t even meta…
No. Both aircraft have 12 pylons but Su-30MK2 cannot use AAM on every one of them.
close enough
the red arrows use the Hawk T.1A has 2 AAMs and a 30mm gunpod
Su-35S has newer digital avionics also you can’t proof if they were integrated with Su-30SM. You have to code it into the aircraft system(R-77 double racks).
I know and i never said it is. I just hate fictional loadouts on this vehicle in game.
And ? The pgm 500/2000 are at the same br as those, also the only advantage of this over the tv mavs is just the point range and the larger warhead, the track range is the same, BTW these are literally worse than the kh29… which some of those already have in game…
What does this have to do with the fact that your amber racks are confirmed mockups.
Except they aren’t? Very clearly at least 4 functional examples exist.
Or how did they load CATMs onto them?
Okay, then please post your evidence, that’s all I’m asking for lol
This famous photo of it which shows the ejector rack (amber rack) is solely for fitting tests and is non functional, as far as I know it never went past that and was never adopted by the U.S. Air Force.
You’ve clearly seen the image.
Your understanding between a mockup and a functioning device is what’s clearly lacking
*Extremely loud incorrect buzzer 📢
You’ve yet to show me any evidence, maybe a statement from someone or a picture of a fighter with it outside of that test.
