Good point but like i said if you give the LAV to the US without canada good luck. Canadian Sub-tree for USA - #145 by AR_M4Sopmod2 - here is a forum i made regarding candada and there addition to the U.S but as you can see it went to crap real quick.
(Granted my delivery for a lot of these post were a bit blunt)

4 Likes
There were test launches from Eurofighter in Wales
Go find a Su-27SM with doble rack missile loadout
1 Like
It has the potential for :
More missiles
Better RWR
More CMs
BOL
IRST pod
And being the “late” F-15C variant will be the one to get new missiles when they are added.
3 Likes
Where is my btr 82AT 😭😭😭😭
Spoiler

2 Likes
And do you really believe that it will get all this stuff?
It should get most of that stuff yes.
It’s just a question of whether they will be on the Dev Server or if bug reports will be required.
But all of them are very easy bug reports
1 Like
BOL pods will get declined instantly lol
Why? It’s the “late”. And these are supposed to be the US’s 14.3 to match the Rafale and EF-2000, BOL is not a stretch in that regard in the slightest.
I personally prefer this one, I wanted to suggest it, doesn’t look like I have to.
1 Like
It happened with the US F-18C lol
I see a light tank / support vehicle i want it ingame. Regardless of nation. MBT Thunder? not for me.
The difference is they made the argument US F-18s only did the testing for BOL integration for other countries and not to use them itself. And it’s not supposed to be the 14.3 Rafale equal.
US F-15s are the only BOL users.
The one they are adding is better anyways.
Gonna love doing the equivalent of headglitching in that thing lol
1 Like
My thought exactly, and it being a Kornet is nice.
1 Like
IMAM (Romeo) Ro.44 “Italian Float Fighter”
maybe . . .
this one however appears to have the gunner, but hard to tell, slightly different model number as well

1 Like
But this one has a 2A72, and the one I dropped has a 2A42 and one more missile