Its still got decent mobility. I dont know why soviet mains like to pretend its slow
1 Like
they wont even accept reports for the boxer
1 Like
Boxer MGS has an accepted report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hSiewRvo43mZ
but accepted and fixed are 2 entirely different things unfortunately
The fact we have a second boxer still not fixed… clearly shows they arent interested in adding spall liners
1 Like
Is OK Comrade, Stalinium will protec you from frontal attakk!
4 Likes
it’s closed so I’m not sure if it really counts, and my report is for all the boxers.
Its accepted. Look at the label in the top right. Its closed because it was accepted and forwarded, if it had been dismissed that would say “not a bug”
for example, dismissed but accurate report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zwZf7KIQ8Kba
true true, but they wont do anything with that little info and from so long ago
You dont know what sources were submitted but most people cant view, if it wasnt enough information it would say “not enough info” like this report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pGTbGs8IVP1z
its been a year, do you think there was enough?
There are plenty of valid reports older than that not fixed. Should see the mountain of reports for the Challenger 2, most average 2+ years old
like:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m22cZZxaNPXJ
or
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PX7CKrwWNGdr
or
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nugZ361FLvcc
It took 3+ years for SRAAMs to get their corrected range and there are reports for the Bucanneer to get Napalm that pre-date the current bug reporting website, about 4 years ago iirc. Im sure there are many many reports that still exist on the old system, that are awaiting implementation. Gaijin can be incredibly slow. Imo, they implement reports only if/when they deem it necessary, I personally consider their statements regarding accurate modeling, this one:
as a marketing lie. They routinely make changes based upon misinformation, such as they did with BOL and have ignored reports submitted reports to fix it (including internal reports by a senior tech mod) despite their above statement (it was highly convenient that BOL was nerfed when the Gripen was newly added and performing well despite BOL being in-game for nearly a year and a half) or just outright ignore reports to correct something if it would make a notable change in performance.
1 Like
It doesn’t. Its on par with Challengers.
Okay? And?
I wouldnt call them slow per-say. Not Maus speed anyway which i would actually call slow.
1 Like
Your definition of slow is definitely, interesting…
Okay and?
Its the speed of an MBT?
Its trading that mobility for having better survivability than most top tier MBTs
To be honest, I have the EBRC Jaguar, it is full of spall liners EVERYWHERE (everywhere)… but I don’t really see the difference between a vanilla armor.
It’s supposed to deny spalls, but…
No, it isn’t. Yeah the Challenger is an MBT, however it is not considered fast, it is actually rather slow.
Okay and?
I still see BMPTs running around the matchs just fine.
if we had a premium pack boxer we would have them in no time
i bet two blt sandwiches on it
1 Like
Tech tree bmpt is worse ofc in that regard but BMPT72 def aint slow (also reaches top speed easily)
Try driving btr82at in the battleship way and you’ll know how fun is spall liners