Am i wrong tho?
2 Likes
Yes, yes you are
1 Like
cherry-picking maybe, but its a perfectly understandable rule, to avoid some nations (cough Russia) being left with their best domestic BB being of WW1 Vintage, or best BB overall being a Loaned BB from another nation, also of WW1 Vintage, while there are things like Iowa’s and Yamato’s roaming about, It’s not just inconsistency, it’s balance (though as ever - done poorly)
More people have made that joke than the total amount of naval players
Not cap, Bismarck being having more displacement than both could have proper power assisted loaders unlike Nau and Sevas. Scharnhorst on the other hand Carries her original 28cm guns.
2 Likes
I’ll give you partial credit for making a ever so slightly more original joke.
That being said, if you really don’t like naval, why continue to comment on a naval oriented thread?
4 Likes
ships like the Chikugo its guns arnt even correct (it can empty its ammo before reloading but in WT fire like 10 rounds and take 2-3 business days to cool ur gun). torps are not the homing ones IT USED. its sonar isnt modelled
and refuses to add the PG-02’s ASM’s which is modelled in the CDK. but is ok with giving russia some rocket ships and the USS Douglas (4.0) literal ASM’s
Only if Naval had +1 player for every time that joke was made…
1 Like
And if only you discussed in good faith
Naval needs a makeover
(I love naval but PLEASE GAIJIN)
2 Likes
homing torps are modeled as regular ones in game, chikugo is not an exception
Fine, i guess im just disappointed because no SPYDER devblog
1 Like
Fair, Spyder should’ve been here a while back
1 Like
I’m just here to spice things up
10/10 gaijin logic
homing torps that cant home
3 Likes
whats really funny is that those very homing torps are really not that powerful, most of them have a really small charge (SET-40 for example)
i guess they dont want to even deal with balancing
2 Likes
Im curious if the current “was laid down rule” holds up in the future, because there will be problems. Like you said the USSR laid down the soyuz bcs no one told Stalin that they could never finish that thing let alone 16 of them. And ships like the Montana class did not get laid down bcs sensible people delayed it in favor of more important projects. So its a bit of a question if “laid down but would have never been finished” is better than “not laid down but very much plausible to be actually built”
5 Likes
I believe the rule will eventually pass, same with the ground and air content, seeing we are pretty much at the current ground climax and not that far for airs.
1 Like
And it’s especially annoying if some far from ever being completed ship then just turns to be crazy strong for no proven reason or op like the khronstadt once was. As long as it gets toned down to a reasonable level like kronshtadt is nowadays for me it is fine cause it benefits no one if certain nations just stop 3 or 4 br steps below top tier. Just dont put stuff in game with fantasy level of armor that could never have been built or crazy guns that would have been impossible.
Its similar to the maus situation. somewhat working but a stupid idea from the beginning, too heavy impossible to get it where u need it and takes too many resources. But if 6.7 would be top tier it would be there fighting all the other 6.7 ww2 tanks. just stupid.
Or you’ll fight much newer tech like missiles in blue print fantasy ships in the future. Like the maus does now fight technology a lot newer that itself.
1 Like
low damage but homing + less range, that seems pretty balanced
2 Likes