Add a realistic version if were going to have blueprint ships, then at least youll have less people complaining about it. Giving it THE best stats possible just makes it look like their hand holding the Russians yet again. ESPECIALLY when they normally take the worst stats. Like with starstreaks when it clearly states mach 3+ with some even saying mach 4 but gaijin have said they take the exact value and dont interpret it any more than that.
10 Likes
Not the most optimistic as shells are slower(could be 870m/s, which proved in test), and speed is not 29 knots, and hydroplane is older one that were considered on design.
Well, but not only Soyuz, it seems that even real ships on this update doesn’t get the most optimistic specs of them(exclude Richelieu)
2 Likes
Richelieu could have its APCBC go 830m/s if we go this way
so, every ship seems impacted indeed
Yes. Sad story.
What you all mean by that ?
I am playing first match with Soyuz now in dev server. I can say this thing is abnormally OP with SAP ammo.
1 Like
Dude… you sealclubbed bunch of bots
Surprise, Surprise. Its a russian blueprint project without any reality limitations. It will dunk on every other ingame vessel. Won’t be fun. Alone its AP shells have more explosive filler than other nation’s (real) HE ones. Supercharged shots which would wear out every real existing barrel after just few shots. I guess barrel wear and service life mean nothing as long as the ship just exists as blueprint in Stalin’s personal design bureau^^
Super charged shot is 870 m/s. During testing, 173 shots were fired from a single barrel. Of these, 17 are super charged, the rest are ordinary (830 m/s). In game we have 830 m/s. Bursting charge is also accurate for AP and SAP. The was also HE shall.
1 Like
Oh wow he sinked bot’s on older ships what a horror
also, just saying. using the cannon against an entire city is a little different than using it against ships. For one, a city doesn’t move… or at least i would hope not.
1 Like