it has been said many times, Naval has different rules to Ground/Air
It takes Multiple Millions in cash and years to create a ship and an immense amount of material
It takes a couple thousand and weeks to make a tank/plane, so prototypes and mock ups are infinitely easier to make
For Navy ships, mock ups and full scale prototypes just are not feasable, hence the different rules gaijin sets
If the USSR gets a ship that is 21-19% complete, I propose this…
This adds to the inconsistancy of gaijin. for some modes its A-OK but for the rest its not
personally it’s cherry picking but again I dont like how inconsistant they are
well, two of the h39 ships were laid down which apparently is the magic line the snail draws for what can be added (which in case of russia ofc helps otherwise there coulndt be any near top tier battleships). While i think it is good that more than three nations get top tier battleships that can hold their own vs each other im not sure if it’s the way to go to implement them with all their impossible we-wish-to-have-but-will-not-in-20-years-be-able-to-build-it-features. Why not add it with something more plausible and (maybe) possibly achievable for the time.
Why should so many actually working and proven designs of legendary vehicles which for actual reasons have to deal with cutbacks due to design and actual technical limitations compete with stuff that is just pure fantasy and would have never been completed?
What would we have in game if some bozo back then just decided to lay down the craziest blueprint imaginable like h-44 for the first 5% even if it would have been completely useless because of missiles not even 10 years later?
WTF? Really? CAP bro like even Scahrnhorst and Bismarck had 30sec and so did Yamayo.
I like your thinking there
Am i wrong tho?
Yes, yes you are
cherry-picking maybe, but its a perfectly understandable rule, to avoid some nations (cough Russia) being left with their best domestic BB being of WW1 Vintage, or best BB overall being a Loaned BB from another nation, also of WW1 Vintage, while there are things like Iowa’s and Yamato’s roaming about, It’s not just inconsistency, it’s balance (though as ever - done poorly)
More people have made that joke than the total amount of naval players
Not cap, Bismarck being having more displacement than both could have proper power assisted loaders unlike Nau and Sevas. Scharnhorst on the other hand Carries her original 28cm guns.
I’ll give you partial credit for making a ever so slightly more original joke.
That being said, if you really don’t like naval, why continue to comment on a naval oriented thread?
ships like the Chikugo its guns arnt even correct (it can empty its ammo before reloading but in WT fire like 10 rounds and take 2-3 business days to cool ur gun). torps are not the homing ones IT USED. its sonar isnt modelled
and refuses to add the PG-02’s ASM’s which is modelled in the CDK. but is ok with giving russia some rocket ships and the USS Douglas (4.0) literal ASM’s
Only if Naval had +1 player for every time that joke was made…
And if only you discussed in good faith
Naval needs a makeover
(I love naval but PLEASE GAIJIN)
homing torps are modeled as regular ones in game, chikugo is not an exception
Fine, i guess im just disappointed because no SPYDER devblog
Fair, Spyder should’ve been here a while back
I’m just here to spice things up