Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

On average, we have a new top tier jet every 3 years

Mate, they have ‘plans’ calm down

is very rare to see this without Pythons and radar missiles, maybe they didnt finished yet

and a dedicated chinese ground attacker for top tier with LGBs. mavericks are overrated.

Have done, but they havent even finsiehd hte jets we got a year ago.

don’t forget Japan SPAA.
Priority is obviously a new MiG and F-16 that weren’t needed.
Heaven forbid the 9.0 to 11.0 SPAA gap would get filled

1 Like

Smin doesn’t make those decisions. He just deals with the inevitable backlash.

1 Like

If Russia’s missiles were better than America’s, why can’t America get said worse counterparts and, instead, must be limited to older models?

Don’t you realise this makes defending the ingame situation even worse?

2 Likes

yes and Russia/US now got 2 new Generations less than a year apart

And how exactly are the F-16C and MiG-29SMT as shoen on the dev stream asymmetrically balanced?

Because asymmetrical balance implies that the F-16C is better in a area.

1 Like

Symmetrical balance is also extremely boring just as much as one vehicle being miles better than another. I currently enjoy the dynamic between F16 vs Mig29 although I personally enjoy the F16 more. Its about as close as I think we’ll ever get to the good old asymmetrical balance of F100 v Mig19 disregarding armament

1 Like

US jets fought in easy wars in the Middle East against outnumbered air forces with export models of old outdated Russian jets. Go figure! That’s the worst argument possible, pure American bias.

5 Likes

MiG-25 can sustain Mach 2.86 and do Mach 3.2 once because the engines explode then

1 Like

Muh excuses

@Smin1080p where can we make historical reports about the unhistorical and inaccurate stats of Hungarian vehicles shown in the dev stream?

to be fair the operators of those soviet planes were mostly from the developing/underdeveloped countries with poor pilot training

2 Likes

Asymmetrical balance means one nation having better IR missiles and the other having better Radar missiles, for example… not one being better than the other in every single way. That’s not asymmetry, that’s imbalance.

well when you run out of missiles what do you do? play guns ofc, also russia gets less flares so by the time youre firing your 3rd missile the mig is on 4 flares

yea cause nothing beats Russian tech.
just like the 2s38 that’s not proven anything, but yet its great in warthunder
or the MiG 29 that’s garbage but amazing in warthunder

Who argued against that? Give them the AIM-9M and AIM-7P, but don’t complain about symmetrical balance not being there. That’s my point.

1 Like