Namely some of the 11.3s, mostly due to the compression from 9.3 - 10.7.
@someweirdname
Sir, the War Thunder community isn’t arrogant.
Just cause I make relevant objections alongside the War Thunder community does not give you & As the right to throw them away with such an insult.
Accept & respect all well-put together objections.
@el_Argentino
Glad we agree on something. I disagree with there being double standards, but we agree about finding absurd justifications & cosmic theories annoying.
It’s like that, just how you describe it. And I add, and that’s where my anger comes from, snails use the same argument to give or deny something to a nation. (double standard).
I will give an example: there is no Australian M1AIM for the UK, but there is an Indian T-90 for the UK.
They tell us that Lynx will not be for Germany, because he never used it. In the same move, they give a research T-90 to UK (counts as any TT vehicle, and not as an event vehicle).
It all seems very capricious and arbitrary, with weak arguments.
T-90S-India was at least mostly produced by India is in-service in India, & is not in legal service in Russia.
M1A1 AIM is produced by General Dynamics in USA & was in service by US forces as well.
You can see that as a fine line, or no line at all.
I see the line clearly personally, and if we don’t share that perspective that’s okay.
It could have been in the British tree, it just went to the US one, just like the T-90 could have been in the Soviet tree but it went to the UK one instead, there is no “can’t” about it, it’s just what happened, it could easily have gone the other way, in this case the shoe fits on both feet.
There is a clear difference between a squad vehicle and an event vehicle. It doesn’t matter where they are located. One of them is researchable, in the same way as the rest of the researchable vehicles. The other is an extraordinary vehicle, very limited and not accessible to the general public.
Any guy who starts playing today can research squad vehicles. Those of events and premiums are the ones that manage another dynamic.
You can say what you want, tu or gaijin, but, for example, the Swiss Hunter is a researchable vehicle from the German TT. Nobody can deny that.
Countries buying export vehicles usually have to follow specific rules about what they can do with them, Australia even though they own the M1A1 AIM can’t just sell it off to whoever they want for example, they have to ask the USA for permission before they can do that.
Imagine this, tomorrow I buy an old LED TV, then I buy a Chromecast, then I paint graffiti on the back, then I change the name slightly, and then I publish it on the internet as a product made by me.
The T-90 Brishma are former T-72BUs manufactured by the Soviets and sold to India. Then modernized in India with Russian assistance.
India is not in the game, the vehicle goes to the USSR.
Or are you justifying British colonialism over India? What the hell is happening here?