Defyn understands air better than I.
Oddbawz understands ground better than I.
I understand analytics rather well which allows me to run comparative analysis of vehicles.
And as for balance:
F-15s, Gripen, F-4F ICE, J-10, etc are all possible now.
Pretty much everything that’s not stealth, non-AESA radar, and minimum loadouts can be 9Ls & AIM-7s can be added to the game now.
this discussion has been going on for a month now and nobody here end especially you aren’t even remotely ready to change their opinion in the slightest, we can stop this here it brought us nothing for the last 18000 messages it won’t change anything for the next 18000
Theoretically, every vehicle has the weapons necessary to kill any other. That does not mean that it’s balanced for everything to stay the same while more powerful vehicles are added. The MiG-29SMT would still be better than the MiG-29A if the latter got R-73’s.
nobody doubts that it’s possible but simple possibility isn’t what balance is after, it’s about a fair fight and it simply isn’t a fair fight to give one aircraft R-60M even tho it pretty much always carried R-73 for “Balance” while another one gets them without hasitation
I mean by his logic we really could just add the F-22 with AMRAAMs and because it is possible to kill it with a MiG-29SMT that means everything is perfectly balanced.