Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

Thanks Trigger :D
Your datum is useful it shows how it fool that dont give aim9m to F16blk20

I’m thinking it might be the F-CK-1 but I’m not really sure.

yes it seens F-CK-1 Ching-kuo
here’s the datum of 鷹揚
“ 鷹揚計畫:
1981年航發中心展開經國號戰機前身之高性能戰鬥攔截機原型研發工作,機型代號初取為「FX」,為求保密並取名為「鷹揚」。航發中心此時並成立鷹揚計劃辦公室。
1982年國防部指示鷹揚戰機之總體性能應不遜於F-16為原則,且以奇異 J79渦輪噴射引擎為動力。當年行政院自立小組並決議進行研製戰機,航發中心此年即成立鷹揚戰機研造處為研發計畫作準備。
1983年航發中心改隸國防部中山科學研究院,鷹揚計劃與雲漢、天箭(天雷)、天翔(天劍)等計畫合併成立安翔計畫。

  • 鷹揚計畫主持人:彭元熙
  • 鷹揚計畫總工程師:邢有光
  • 鷹揚計畫作業室主任:李適彰
  • 鷹揚計畫管理組長:祝志太”
1 Like

It’s okay if you think about it, it’s your thought.

What you propose is what I was fighting for yesterday. You should review the previous conversation.

Basically, I don’t understand why we don’t get the KF-41, but UK gets the T-90.

In other words, I don’t understand why the UK cannot receive M1 AIM, but it can receive T-90 Brishma.

I already said what I had to say about this. I finish here.

DOUBLE STANDARD

A simple fact: when there are many people against you, you’d better reflect on whether you’re doing something wrong.

This week for sure, on Tuesday imo ;)
PS can’t wait to return to Italian early ranks and open new Hungarian additions, though I also hope they’ll change few things before update goes live, like return of Hungarian Hinds into its own line and rework of Italian Bluewater TT, destroyers placement on the dev-server is kinda mess and illogical.
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/roadmap-changes-grouping-vehicles-rank-changes-and-improvements-to-premium-vehicles-dev-server-feedback/22131/60

They don’t planned to make additional armor for pso. Was an official answer.

Fair enough! Still a neat jet.

Anyways, anyone have any leaks/mines for the upcoming crafting event?

Also, how does the “buying rewards” go for the crafting event? Am on console and no time to play but kinda wanna know what the main air prize would cost and how to get it. Some other events you simply buy 8 to 10 999GE stars.
Hope no one thinks bad of it. Sometimes there’s great vehicles but between work and family life I have no time to grind those events!

Except it doesn’t. The Mk7 wasn’t adopted by any trees in game. Hungary is in the game.

1 Like

They said it’s not planned, just like they said it’s not planned for the AIM-9M to come.

And the KF-41 is German.

Okay then, what’s your justification for these?

  • SK105 (France)

  • Mi28A (Sweden)

  • AHS (Sweden)

Not used by their nation, not made by their nation, service trees already in game. So why should these trees get them?

1 Like

G’day,

Figured I’d ask here but anyone hear if soviet small anti-submarine ships aka ASW Corvettes will get their Strela-3 SAM’s this update? They were destined for last update yet never came, They were being tested on the Project 1241.2P yet disappeared once the update dropped.

So what?

The SK105 was going into the German tree until the French mains burned the forums down.

6 Likes

So you advocate for their removal without immediate or any replacement?

You still didn’t justify the other two.

Sure, remove them.

There is no justification. Gaijin making poor decision for Sweden doesn’t justify making other poor decision.

That is correct.
The aircraft known as the XF-2A was not equipped with armament until it underwent modifications to upgrade it to the F-2.
The XF-2A (Prototype 1) was equipped with neither machine guns nor radar, Prototype 2 had only radar, the XF-2B (Prototype 3) also had only radar, and only Prototype 4 of the XF-2B was fully armed, with instrumentation in the back seat, and was tested for shooting and bombing at the Misawa and Matsushima bases.
If the XF-2 is to be implemented as a prototype, it would be difficult to use anything other than this aircraft of the XF-2B.
If you want to implement the XF-2, which was once called a prototype, you can use any of the 1-4 aircraft, but they are just F-2s with a different paint job.
Or it may be possible to implement the XF-2A (Prototype 2) or XF-2B (Prototype 3) as an F-2 without a machine gun.
However, there is no documentation that these two aircraft were armed and tested. Even if they were armed, they were probably only tested with dummy missiles.
(The second prototype was tested for flight characteristics and mission suitability. Prototype III was tested in high AoA and run tests on snow. It is possible that dummy armament was equipped from these missions.)

Seems like the ideal candidate.

Just slap some experimental radar with armaments from later conversion and we have an XF-2A.

So it should go in the German tree.