@Smin1080p Hi. I was wondering when are we going to see FSR being added?Not many people can afford RTX cards so FSR could help the people who dont own RTX graphics cards.It is also far better than DLSS.
1 Like
Has anyone ever seen these ingame ?
They’re similar to the interactable map icons AB Air has for capturable airfields, but I can’t think of a place where these Aircraft Carrier versions are used.
3 Likes
Didn’t there used to be naval air maps in the map rotation for WWII era battles?
There still are, they just don’t come up often since they still require a given amount of players to be queueing aircraft w/ the " Naval Aircraft " spawntag ( and I suspect they’re still nation-locked, too ).
This kind of icon doesn’t seem to be for that though - those maps represent the AC 's the same way they would non-capturable airfields, w/ a red or blue rectangle.
dlss works REALLY well in war thunder and I don’t even think it’s the newest version. Hope they get that for AMD guys
Oh, thanks. Thought it was a legit response lol. They be like that usually.
spain used to have a ship spawn, they removed the ships, you used to be able to spawn on them as a mig 21 and get an air spawn
I remember when baku was first added and was in live matches… those were fun times.
Warthunder? Why does it take so long? I mean the devs could concentrate a little bit more on Israel because they dont do anything. They are just copying the chaparral from the USA to israel. The devs are strange.
1 Like
Well… Drakon isnt a chaparral?
what leopard is that?
Strv 122a in a camo net. Look sick 👌
And does anyone else think that the leopards (including Swedens) should have mud flaps? It looks a lot better with them
1 Like
a leopard commander did a review of the PSO and played the hungarians 2a4, he complained how empty they looked and said if they ever wanna give it a graphical update they shall contact him lmao
1 Like
That’s what I mean. I told @Smin1080p that the mud flaps are missing on the strv 122s and the Finnish leopard 2a6. Even though they are showed on the wiki. Btw @Smin1080p, I hope I clarified correctly that the war Thunder wiki is correct and the models in game are wrong. Not the other way around. I may have not clarified so I thought I just might let you know
1 Like
thats what copy pasta stuff gives u
But the Finnish 2a4 has them and the German 2a4 doesn’t. Which doesn’t make any sense to me. Did they just forget to model it in?
so at this point we can confirm that no update tomorrow right? :C
I am catching up on the talk regarding the MICA.
It would be nice. But why are people pushing for the MICA when they can just stop holding the Magic II back?
It’s 40g+ missile (iirc). The Magic II has much more range than it does in game, and a stronger thrust over the previous Magic (not modelled). Additionally, it has ECCM and HMS compatibility in the M2K (not modelled). The Magic II is a completely competent missile for the M2K right now if GJ would stop building a hedge around the USSR/Federation.
Regarding Aim series missiles.
The aim9Ls and Ms are completely competent competitors to the R73 if they gave them their actual lock ranges in all aspects. Or even just giving the M its reduced smoke signature would offer at least one advantage the SMT does not have.
GJ has intentionally taken range out of every weapon system of western fighters IR & Radar missiles which is core to their doctrine. They cannot be bothered to model the tactical improvements and differences between the Aim-7F & M, Aim54A & C, Aim-9J & P and you best believe the Aim-9M is going to be a copy paste L.
We keep asking GJ for new missiles when literally every western missile is either nerfed or a copy paste of the previous variant. We should make them fix/model the missiles we already have in game, or we will continue to receive half developed missiles imo.
11 Likes