was a rhetorical question
Ah yes the thermal upgrade that we again had to wait even longer then Germany for that other nations had for years.
And the SEP is just as poorly modeled missing proper Ammunition and quite a lot of armor and improper modeling of said “better” ERA
the hell u talking about we are still at gen 1 thermals for gunners
(most tanks exception the worse 2PL)
I wasnt talking about Germanys therms.
u said even longer then germany
Exactly we had to wait for an upgrade longer then you guys have been waiting you misinterpret what I meant
ah yes the 2 years since our last tank… definitly
In between the 2A6 and the PSO, America recieved 3 TT Abrams and 1 squadron
We got our last MBT upgrade in 2018 and didnt get another until 2022 in Nov almost 5 years.
All sidegrades
so is the PSO
I never said it wasnt.
The PSO is a side grade lmao
My point is you all want a tank “equal” with the 122 but the issue is it will be better always
Has anyone got the test drive links for the new vehicles ?
? The 2A6 HEL is a 2A6 with Gen 2 thermals, the 2A6EX has the same addon armor as the 122B and nothing else
they dont work dont bother
1 Like
Its a Leopard 2A5 derivative. If the PSO stays as it currentlly is on Dev, the A6 will still remain the best tank of the Ger TT…after 3 years. PSO would have been nice as event addition, but is certainly not the new MBT, alot players waited for since three years.
Pretty funny, currenlty they’re working on the Leopard 2A9 (project name 2AX), the currently most recent model is the 2A8, followed by the 2A7V, 2A7 … also countless export versions and industry Designs. We’re not talking about the tank line from Rheinmetall with the Panther as flagship. Wouldn’t be surprised if everything somehow ends in the swedish or whatever TT via this weird subtree policy.
Exactly my point, ITS A 2A6 it will be better even if it was a 2A5 with addon armor itd still be better because of the ammo and lineup.