Canadian CF-18 would be a better fit when the F/A-18s come to the game
Yea but I’m thinking more of a stop gap think though
😂😂 someone’s going to take this post seriously because they don’t know BAE and Rheinmetall are making the challenger 3
Can someone explain the difference to me? It’s just that my head can’t process this stupidity, in relation to the KF-41.
T-90 Bhishma >>>
Origin: Russia
Spoiler
(T-72BU modified by India)
Operator: India
TT: British.
L2 C2A1 >>>
Origin: German
Spoiler
(L1A3 + Tower 1A5 + mexas modified by the Canadian army)
Operator: Canada
TT: German.
KF-41 >>>
Origin: German
Operator: Hungary
TT: Italian.
SK-105 >>> (this one is crazy)
Origin: Austria
Operator: Argentina
TT: German
Why the hell doesn’t the German technology tree receive German technology? What the hell is happening here?
5 Likes
i think it’s pretty clear that gaijin adds vehicles however they please and that there aren’t any strict rules they are following
3 Likes
I get that but I also don’t think it’s good to throw too many different nations at the UK tree, personally I’m hoping for the Gripen and F/A-18 next patch then the F-15 and SU-27 in December so hopefully not waiting too long.
1 Like
Mhm tbh when it comes to rule of X nation they should say nothing as it confuses the hell out of us
*TT: Hungarian
Just thought I’d fix that for you.
1 Like
Oh yea we will get the Gripen by the end of the year if not the next update.
Tbh that is why I think they are holding back the Hungarian aviation sub tree.
And the UK could get either the Gripen or the CF-18 before the end of the year which I think makes more sense and is a lot more fun than another F-16. Like we haven’t seen enough of them already
1 Like
That is more than clear. The point is that when they deny you something, they bring up ridiculous arguments like
“KF-41 is not used by Germany, it is exclusive to Hungary” said by Smin himself.
There are thousands of examples like this, depending on what suits you, it is technology, or used by the army, or tested, or borrowed, or there were some plans and… etcetera and more etcetera.
1 Like
with South Africa missile A-Darter, YES
2 Likes
Okay guys…but now for real.
Mig-23MLD will get Kh-29T:
2 Likes
Mhm and the SAAF Gripen can lead the UK to have the Cheetah too.
1 Like
second part of Discussion roundup and second ban, keeping it consistent it seems
still no sign of gnat even on the second dev server
I find it hard to believe. Tell me where is the Finnish technology in the Swedish TT?
Gaijin will introduce AESA radars at the same exact time they’ll introduce XF-2. That’s their known behavior, any deviation would be a change of behavior.
Same with limited armament, leaving AAM pylons empty would be a change of behavior.
You mean like how the F-4C and F-4E came without SARHs? Or the British FGR.2 being released without PD mode working? Or even now where stuff like the A-10 premium can only carry 2 9Ls despite having the double-rail launchers?
They absolutely release things in a semi-to-non-functional state if they feel like it
2 Likes
oh hell no the infamous APU-60-3
1 Like
I mean it’s called a sub tree. there is a Finnish air tree, a S. African ground tree and a Hungarian ground tree. It’s not that complicated.
It isn’t like the KF-41 was randomly given to Italy, Hungary’s ground tree was put in the Italian tree and the KF-41 is a Hungarian vehicle.
1 Like
You mean FGR2 that was introduced as the first ever PD-capable jet back in 2019?
2019 isn’t the year anymore, and hasn’t been for 4 years.
2020 for F-4E; Again, not 2023.
No, they don’t release things with missing AAM pylons.
Less than 6 months of additions like that doesn’t make that the rule especially when the rule has been “add things with all their AAM pylons filled that have them filled IRL” for the passed 3 years.
And “add things with correct radars” with one exception every now and then, for the last 2+ years.