Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

Game Discussion General Discussion
7814

Except you just said EJ Kai had all of its radar capabilities & AAM pylons filled.
EJ Kai’s radar was fully functional, being the first ever F-16 radar in WT.
And since that F-16 radar has a CWI it can fir AIM-7Es & E-2s, thus the loadout is still available even if IRL it was not equipped.

As I said previously, it does not matter if IRL nations equipped the loadouts or not, it only matters if they’re capable of them.

Gaijin will introduce AESA radars at the same exact time they’ll introduce XF-2. That’s their known behavior, any deviation would be a change of behavior.
Same with limited armament, leaving AAM pylons empty would be a change of behavior.

Underestimating AESA’s strength at making SARHs more powerful shouldn’t be understated.
And we still don’t know if notch zones exist.
Yes, F-2 will be the first AESA aircraft, facing against conventional radars until F-16 Block 60 is added.

7815

It’s fake. It took me 10 minutes of work in paint . net. xD

1 Like
7816

Lmao

7817

I just invented the APU-60-3 xDDDDDD

7818

I mean if you want to believe what are essentially conspiracy theories of Gaijin lying about britian not being a commonwealth tree over actual proof from Smin be my guess, but I prefer to go wirh proven claims.

7819

So in that case then you believe what Mike said that KV 41 should’t go into Germany because it wasn’t in German service ?

7820

I mean Smin basically said it isn’t a Commonwealth tree but Commonwealth vehicles will be added to it.

It’s not the whole Commonwealth but it is a tree with Commonwealth vehicles in it where needed

3 Likes
7821

Well then many vehicles should not be in the trees they are in.
As you can easily see again with War Thunder there is no clear set of ‘rules’ stating which requirements a vehicle need to fulfill to be added at all or to any particular tech tree.

7822

Mike is a streamer, and while he has some inside knowledge he has also said wrong things in the past.

Compared to Smin, one of the community managers who seems to be able to get into direct contact with the devs.

1 Like
7823

So then where is our Jordan F-16 ?

7824

No Mike isn’t just a Streamer he works at gaijin as well.

7825

Yeah Gaijin will just do as they please with commonwealth vehicles.

It fills a role/gap in the british tree? Sure give them X commonwealth vehicle.

US or Germany need a new event/squadron/premium vehicle? Sure give them Y commonwealth vehicle if they have a good connection to it.

1 Like
7826

The obvious answer is Gaijin doesn’t think its needed.

7827

Canadian CF-18 would be a better fit when the F/A-18s come to the game

7828

Yea but I’m thinking more of a stop gap think though

7829

😂😂 someone’s going to take this post seriously because they don’t know BAE and Rheinmetall are making the challenger 3

7830

Can someone explain the difference to me? It’s just that my head can’t process this stupidity, in relation to the KF-41.

T-90 Bhishma >>>
Origin: Russia

Spoiler

(T-72BU modified by India)

Operator: India
TT: British.

L2 C2A1 >>>
Origin: German

Spoiler

(L1A3 + Tower 1A5 + mexas modified by the Canadian army)

Operator: Canada
TT: German.

KF-41 >>>
Origin: German
Operator: Hungary
TT: Italian.

SK-105 >>> (this one is crazy)
Origin: Austria
Operator: Argentina
TT: German

Why the hell doesn’t the German technology tree receive German technology? What the hell is happening here?

5 Likes
7831

i think it’s pretty clear that gaijin adds vehicles however they please and that there aren’t any strict rules they are following

3 Likes
7832

I get that but I also don’t think it’s good to throw too many different nations at the UK tree, personally I’m hoping for the Gripen and F/A-18 next patch then the F-15 and SU-27 in December so hopefully not waiting too long.

1 Like
7833

Mhm tbh when it comes to rule of X nation they should say nothing as it confuses the hell out of us