Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

[02ded]

i mean apex predators but i keep saying apex legends so i just went with jt

[JohnOverKill]

I mean the R-73 would most likely be fine if it werent for the R-27ER the single best SARH in the game being on the MiG-29. I think it should have the R-73 if the R-27ER gets removed. But how likely is that to happen? 0%

[02ded]

30% of mig 29 users want to keep ers, the rest want to trade ers for r73

is what i believe the number of people is

[JohnOverKill]

Do you have a single piece of empirical data to support that?

[oppsijustkilledu]

It shouldn’t be possible with R73 this is a big on gaijins end on those videos you’ve seen

[02ded]

no

[_Vox]

yea and im waiting on my RB99

[dotSHINI]

and the biggest number of communist mains just wants both, like communists they want both shared between their aircraft

[Morvran]

Now the Soviet main probably has never played a TOrnado F3, but do you know that the mig-29 is faster, can turn tighter and has better BVR and IR missiles than the F3. The F3 is barely an 11.3 currently, meanwhile the Mig-29 in its current state probably needs to move up to 12.3. R-73s would 100% mean at least 12.3 maybe even 12.7

Tornado F3 in its current state is maybe a match for the Mig-23MLD and is currently waiting on both Aim-9M and AMRAAM, its current set up is 100% placeholder. But we could also take Sea Harrier FA2 with both Aim-9M and AMRAAM as well at this stage and still not be competitive with the Mig-29 in its current state

[TheGhOsTGeneral]

I agree, but with what I’ve played and seen, I’m perfectly okay with them adding the CURRENT 73 to the 29. It’d be a challenge to fight against, but I’d enjoy it.(Granted, I’d also enjoy it flying the 29 as well lol)

[JohnOverKill]

Then you can’t say that. I for one think the MiG-29 should stay as is.

[Iithilien]

I wouldn’t call myself a main of China and GB, but they do so happen to be the nations I find the most enjoyment in, even though I have top tier aviation in every nation save Italy and France.

[_Vox]

Cause Mig-29 totally needs R-73

[02ded]

yes

[dotSHINI]

from what i heard in dcs they are modelled to be able to do it as well, seems like the r73 is able to that, problem is it shouldnt be the only missle capable of it in the game

[oom1992]

@Legwolf

This has to be the worst take ever.

1. Militaries export their arms. Yes, you’re going to see the same vehicles sometimes, operated by different people.
2. The end of the British tree is Eurofighter. A joint venture fighter, much like Panavia Tornado.
3. It still doesn’t mean they shouldn’t get something. They need viable air power. Britains last fighter? Phantom. Britians highest BR plane? Subsonic IR missiles. Britians most modern plane? A bomber with Skyflash.

@Razielkaine

Australian F/A-18 A and B and F-111C and G. Older options are Mirage III and A-4G and Australian designed CAC Sabre.

I’m surprised gajin consider ground vehicle & aircraft from Australian, Canadian and Indian as part of great britain tree ?

@someweirdname

as a possible addition the G is only fit as an Event or Premium tbh

Luftwaffe never even had ERs so it would only have R-60MK, R-73 and R-27R

So I might hope any day dev consider remove R-27ER & R-27ER1 and could add R-73 on MiG-29A 9-12A from east germany and MiG-29 9-13 from USSR in the future

[_Vox]

Man, you are Bias

[02ded]

im the embodiment of russian bias

[Deathmisser]

He says NATO mains which is a stupid term

[JohnOverKill]

@oom1992

I might hope any day dev consider remove R-27ER & R-27ER1 and could add R-73 on MiG-29A 9-12A from east germany and MiG-29 9-13 from USSR in the future

Honestly I think the German one should have R-73s and no R-27ERs while the Soviet one should have R-27ERs but not R-73s. It would add a reason for say a Soviet main to grind the German TT.