Having looked at it again and yea just hidden but still how was that offensive ?
Oh that’s cool. Didn’t bother searching too much
I mean they are just a regular fire and forget missile that has a lot of range, not like it matters since you’re not going to be engaging anything from that far away anyway
I seriously doubt the Peten would get it, no point if the Saraph does
If you think it’s an abusive “rage report”, you’d better contact the community manager. I’m not Smin1080p.
Unfortunately I can’t help you with this problem as I’m a normal user without any administrative privileges…
just want to leave this little thing here from 2 years ago^^
Spoiler
while a great addition to the tech tree and a needed one, i seriously hope once helis get their superior weaponry , germany will get a netherland ah 64, or that germany at the end gets a ah 64 or AH viper themself since the tiger uht is dead
I mean, they are still suggestions from the Old forum for example with a total amount of 12 Pars, the current 2x4 on the inner pylons, and also 2x2 for the outer pylons… still waiting… or for Mistral instead of the Stinger
of course still many “loadouts” available, but main armement upgrade is nothing on the horizon, if you compare it with the other armament upgrades the other helis would get
sadly true, so, Gaijin we know you work on it, pls gib
Spoiler
We already have Spikes on Freccia.
huge difference between 5km ground launched ones and 16km air launched ones with thermal scope, they are way stronger then pars 3. the problem is that not many nations have an spaa yet with a 16km range
There is no need for 16 km variant. Spike ER has 8 km range, also the speed of missile makes it way worse. If Gaijin implements it the same way as on Freccia - F&F only, then it isn’t even top tier material.
1 Like
In case of the H145M it has pretty good optics.
Found this in the Old forum about it:
"The daylight camera (which WT afaik uses for magnification) has 36.3° to 1.1° FoV, which assuming the same 73.7° at 1x of the UHT/AH-64 gives ~2x to ~67x.
If you instead take the 26.7° to 0.36° FoV of the thermal imager would give a zoom of ~2.8x to ~205x (lmao)"
24T got nerfed so it certainly has not 9L level of flare resistance ( unless i missed something since it’s been a long time i haven’t touched it ) so i guess you mean R-27T which kinda gets the same level of flare resistance due to the low fov . I would not necessarily disagree with that but i picked the 9L for the sake of the argument to show that you can have some of the best missiles even at lower BRs thus invalidating the argument to which i was responding to .
1 Like
Haven’t seen any data mines in a while, anyone have a link where those usually get posted?
Searched reddit but got kind of a jumble of different data mines so easy to miss something.
Anyone have a good link/location where they get regularly uploaded?
https://www.reddit.com/user/SwannSwanchez/submitted/
Just use Oshida’s account and look at their posts
1 Like
thx, that’ll work
Is there any news on changes to the Magic II? I heard someone saying they confirmed it was going to get a higher G overload
I meant R-24T. Compared to the AIM-9L and R-27T, the R-24T has good acceleration and a short burntime, which reduces the probability of detection. In addition, it has a much greater effective range, which also reduces the probability of detection than in the case of the AIM-9L.