Oh yeah, the notch width is now only 15 km/h (listed as minimal radial speed for target detection) IIRC. In comparison, the APG-66 on the F-16s has a notch width of 50 knots. So, ~4.16 m/s of the MiG vs ~25.72 m/s of the F-16. Also, the increased range to 120 km / 40 km for front and rear aspects for a target with an RCS of 5 m^2. Similar to the Yak-141, it also has cracked horizontal gimbal limits of ±85°.
Some slides from the producer of the export version (the 15 km/h figure is at the bottom of the second slide):
I’m not US or air main so I can’t care less about that. What I can’t stand is russia mains like you that only play russia talking like russia is the weakest nation and it needs everything right NOW!
Israel should get their F16C blk. 50, would be really annoying to not get it at this point, unless they get a different BVR platform, but this seems much easier to just c+p from US.
Yes, I mentioned it. The Yak-141 has the N010 Zhuk so that’s my point of reference. The N010M on the izdeliye 9-19 has ground mapping modes, ECM resistance/virtually jamproof and a slightly higher search range (100 → 120 km).
In-game no radar can engage and track multiple targets, but it could track 10 and allowed the plane to engage 4 simultaneously with R-77s.
No problem. I don’t know which images you’re talking about but it’s possible there’s no reason behind that. The izdeliye 9-17 especially was a testbed and airshow plane in MAKS-2005. If you look closely, it has the new wing design nonetheless. All MiG-29s adopted it since the MiG-29M izdeliye 9-15 prototype.
It’s odd because they skipped the MiG-29S. If they really want R-77s, then why skip almost an entire generation lol…
and of course no JH-7 yet for China. either we get nothing or anything that is not a top tier ground attacker on par with the F-14B, tornado, and mig-27K
