First you need to figure out if you’re talking about Swiss or Swedish, they’re two different countries.
The only Polish vehicle I can think of is the Leopard 2PL, and I mean…do I really have to explain why that vehicle is in the German tree?
Beyond that, the existence of a certain vehicle in a certain tree doesn’t mean that that tree is a subtree.
on the last part, it doesn’t matter if its far fetched or justufied
this off topic argument has been going on since for 3 days and was finally calm now
Jes CAN WE DROP THE SUB TREE THING A REST PLEASE FOR ONE DAY
because it is proximity related as well and they just fit, same reason greece could be a sub nation for italy, we could argue the rumoured hungary doesnt realy have anything to do with italy either
I really don’t see the good in putting them in their designer states, it just seems a waste, more mirage 2000s for France, more F-16s for USA, more Leopards for Germany, you don’t get anything new out of it.
Sub trees at least allow you to run an all Greece lineup in multi spawn game modes, like I said for the nations already in game France makes the most sense, ideally they would get their own tree but IDK if they have enough content for it.
it’s over, we need to get Pingu out again
who are you and what did you do with deathmisser? <.< the day i see you not wanting to speak about a new nation
Then people shouldn’t be bringing up whatever fantasy subtree they want to if they don’t want to be contradicted.
well you just said no, you gave no real reason
Tbh I’m just sick and tired of this roller-coaster thread now
That’s a difference of opinion. You’d rather have a nation tree that’s essentially not a nation tree, whereas I’d prefer for each nation to be as unique as possible.
of cause they want it to be contradicted
but we must not answer their call for this argument raged in circles for days now with no outcome whatsoever
dont worry tmws dev blogs again, and it gets on track again for 5min
I hope so
yeah no, that train drove of a long time ago
but it just came back… we gon miss it again?
Post-war ships all have higher RoF compared to their wartime counterparts (something America very much does not need a buff in). Missiles are also included on at least one of them and we very much don’t need any more of those for a very long time.
yeah it looks pretty neat, gets 2 hellfires, a rocket pod and a .50 cal and could go in both the US and Taiwanese TT
Wow, a lot of conversation about AMRAAMs in this thread… after a 500+ reply long discussion/argument of German, British, Swiss, planes and tech trees. What else am I missing?
Fox 3s, whether they be the R-77 or AMRAAM A/Bs shouldn’t face anything below current top tier - “oh but it’s only an F-4F Ice, it’s a bad airframe” - the entire point of these missiles is that they guide themselves when terminal, and they are fired from a long distance away, kind of negating this “bad airframe” argument.
Fox 3s should be 13.0 minimum , they shouldn’t be “12.3” so they face these fucked up BRs with Su-25s, MiG23s, F4s, F104s, etc.
I mean naval Guided missiles aren’t implemented that much yet otherwise the modern Costal Frigates would need a lot of a BR increase