İ also play almost all other nations but i still have favourite spot for every nation in this game.
So telling me you dont have favourite one isnt exactly a honest answer.
German mbt addition 2-3years bad game decision as well eady as thst doesnt mean it has to be like that when there are tested options
So if you been playing for a long time then you should of understood why gaijin is adding stuff like,
Swedish helicopters, T-80 and the F-16AJ.
So abolish nation based trees completely, if we’re not sticking to what these nations actually had then theres no point in having them.
All vehicles got evaluated that wete named and those valid, it is libertys that get taken zo make the game more fun and balanced
The fun is in flying in a way that means i don’t have to worry so much about an MLD on my tail, good dogfighter tend to end up in dogfights going slow, that makes them easy targets for me in my 104 keeping it above mach 1 to a religious degree
İt wasnt understandable in any way.
The reason they added those trial helicopters and T80U into Swedish tree was because they wanted attract more player into that tree so they could sel more premium vehicles or accounts.
İt was purely financial decision.
The UK actually has a good choice: the Australian F/A-18A/B/F
Phantom is too old for Tornado and Harrier to hold up the TOP TIER sky, which may be the last resort
German words… Phantom ICE + modernized East German MiG-29G is theoretically enough, only need to add Tornado ECR Alpha Jet, etc. to increase the overall performance is basically enough.
In the rest, Germany can start with ground forces, focus on the development of the army, you can add, for example, some vehicles from Austria, the integration is still good.
Only the F-16ADF is available in Italy, and it will be less competitive in subsequent updates because it is an older batch and not enough to compete with other more advanced aircraft.
The Hungarian subtree may be a very suitable choice, the JAS-39 of the Air Force, the Lnyx IFV Leopard 2A7HU of the Army can improve the competitiveness of the Italian TT and attract more players, at present, the Italian TT players are very few, in order to increase the potential players and GAIJIN’s monetary revenue, these are very necessary.
While retaining the characteristics of TT in each country as much as possible, it is completely necessary and feasible to increase the competitiveness of small TT as much as possible, and all of the above are helpless moves, because there is no choice, it is difficult to avoid copying and pasting.
1 Like
Ohhh noooo we have 0 patience!!! Just play other trees or something
And if you dont want any cross nation stuff, lets just remove all captured ww2 vehicles shall we? Things like this doesnt make sense and drstroy the game the diversity is good for it
It is a big gap and the reason it happened IRL is because the threat of war became pretty far fetched around 1991 so most of Europe took their hand off the throttle when it came to defence
1 Like
MLD is faster then your F104S in straight line and also accelerates better once you pass Mach1.
Therefore you can basically do nothing against any competetive MLD player in your flying pencil.
Since Argentina is pretty much a sub tree I could see them adding more of their jets
Uh… no not really sport…
You’re the ones whining for things that have no basis in reality. I’m saying play the hand you’re dealt, if you want a given vehicle then you’re free to grind the requisite tree.
There really is no point in having nation based trees if they’re not aligned to what said nations actually had… it just doesn’t make any sense.
1 Like
It makes trees more diverse. If tree’s vehicles are unique, playing another one gives experience that youve never had. You cant be more diverse than that
Are you really trying to tell me what I enjoy at this point, there are ways to compete in off meta aircraft, just because you can’t do it doesn’t mean it’s not possible
1 Like
Again swedish helicopters and t80 it already doesnt make sense
No argument there, the Swedish heli tree is a joke, and as I already said, making a mistake once doesn’t mean you need to make it again.
4 Likes
You know what enjoying means in general right?
You might be enjoying in your F104S against better planes that only concerns you but that doesnt mean that plane is enjoyable for most of the player base.
How can you call it a mistake if it’s a policy change ?
A company can’t have one policy one rule for a decade