You would call a the R-27R and R-77 useless ?
On that airframe?
Yes I would
it can defend itseld just as much as an a10 could
R27R and R77 are useless argument it doesnt have them in the game lol, they were added as pure strike aircraft, they want to add later variants with those capabilies but those added wont get them
still you are taking wish thinking things into the argument that arent a thing in the game, gamewise the A10C is the equivalent
I agree on that
they were never going to add the R-77 to the game just for the SU-39, it may get it eventually when it does come out but it can wait for everyone else to get their advanced fox 3s first, and as for the R-27 IDK if the SU-25TM could carry it, but even if it could it really wouldn’t be very effective
Its already confirmed the R-77 will be added later on.
i agve up on it, i see this more as the gernal chat bubble
u didnt say nato lol and i said western equivalent not specified where
nothings confirmed, they said a new su 25 will be added with those
sorry that you cant read i forgot
a6m5 is from chinese servers or something
6 Likes
No one else has an equivalent because the concept it stupid, why bother with an A-10 or SU-25 when you can fill the same role just as well with an F-16 or EF-2000 or F-15E whilst still being a capable A2A platform actually able to defend itself and self escort?
There is no other one capable of using the R-77.
I know that, everyone knows that, I said they weren’t going to add it early for the SU-39
it is gajin they will call it SU 39 late , or will find some other obscure designation
losing a Su-25 is not cheap but losing a F-16 thats a whole different story, you dont wanna get shot down while doing CAS these ground attackers exist for a reason, sure the A-10 is meh its too slow USA should develop a faster one.
you were told already that the players moderate the forums now… its not hard to grasp
They cant do it, its unrealistic and fantasy
thats exactly what they did