You’d uh, you’d think that wouldn’t ya, but here on console it ain’t showing
anyone talked about these already?
R-27 and 73 pylon on SU-39
sadly i saw it already, it can stay in one of the x SU39 threads
Don’t restart a topic here when it’s been going on for days.
counterpoint, the new forums are so bad… i LITERALLY COULDNT FIND IT (and im not scrolling 10min in 1 topic)
i think we can agree on this, yes?
@ElBananitolive @Major_Majestic36 and anyone else interested, my short dive into WTM 's carrier air group mechanics is posted here ( Aircraft Carriers - WT Discussion - #18 by Motherhen357 )
what abt su 25t
Don’t ask as your gonna get day’s worth of comment comparing datasheets.
You overestimate them, the F4 Phantom already have them on 11.3 theirs are a different brand and called Phyton 3 but they are almost the same.
Su-25T doesnt use the R-27 & R-77.
Aim-9Ms are not in War Thunder.
And Python 3s don’t have IRCCM.
I have IRCM on the R-27 and they can be flared off aswell at ease.
I will probably use the R-27T when they add the SU-27’s cuz right now you can only use 2 BVRs on the MiG-29 and thats a waste if you place the weaker heak seeker variant instead of the ER.
Never had that ability to carry them. Only the Su-39/Su-25TM had the ability to carry radar guided missles as it could also carry the radar pod.
They are in the files, just not used
Some people just like to stir things up showing how short sighted and close minded they are.
Woop woop event day 1! Good luck everyone!
Calm your tits; it hasn’t started yet.
Mfw I hate people being excited about an event
Guys shut up now.
Can you do anything other than moan about a missile for what almost a week now.
they should rename this thread to missile and off topic discussion.Where did the mods go? None of them respond in this thread. They used to respond in the old forum.