The image you sent said it was a penetrator blast fragmentation, I must’ve misunderstood it.
In that case, AGM-65s with the 300lb warhwad are still not the same class as Kh-29, but they are also bot the same as AGM-65s with the 125lb warhwad. They would be bunker busters. To be honest we could use munition physics and bunker buster munitions ingame, would be helpful agaibst pillboxes.
I agree the US F-4E should get LGBs, but so do a lot of other aircraft ingame. Many hightier Israeli aircraft are missing a ton of domestic armament and I dunno why Gaijin won’t give it to them. However, I’ve been seeing America snd Puccia mains all over the comments crying like donkeys about USA “USA/Russia needs a buff! Our options are so weak!!!”.
While adding bettee AGM-65s to the game is cool we have other priorities that need taking care off first. I mean ffs Jacrap mains only have the F-16AJ as the single platform with PGMs in their entire goddamn air tree. Give them at least a ground attacker with PGMs.
The proof for “there is no double standards”.
I know the damn F-4E loadouts already.
I have personally seen you call others russian fanboys when they simply called you out.
Too bad you just love to edit your comments to make them seem cleaner, so no one can find them anymore.
We have already answered this question (and addressed it in T-90 Bhishma devblog).
We’d like to note that we are continuing to work on filling the British ground forces tree, which will include various armored, infantry fighting vehicles, and light tanks. These are planned for the future.
So yes, there will be more, but we cannot provide specific time frame, sorry.
Q: do you think In Simulation mode we should play with no additional indicators (speed ,weaponry,aditional radar display… etc).
But we all need to play and learn the inside, the plane instruments!
That way every plane will feel different and nice to play!
It would be great to see a buff to the Chinese Aircraft, especially with the J-7D it is considerably a weak premium and so I propose one of the following
Option 1 - BR Reduction to 10.7 with the removal of a missile
Option 2 - Keeping it at 11.0 and introducing a later PL-5 model (e.g PL-5E II) with All-Aspect capability similar to the Mig-21 Lazur-M with 6 R-60Ms
Option 3 - Moving to 11.3 with the removal of current missiles and being able to only use PL-8s
Option 4 - Most Radical idea replacing the J-7D with either F-8 IIM or J-8B Peace Pearl.
Which historical document proves F-16C had the ability to fire AIM-7s? I couldn’t find any source after much searching, and this seems dubious at best. Meanwhile J-8F doesn’t get PL-11.
That would honestly be interesting, although some aircraft had some elements only displayed in the pilot cockpit (RWR on some Soviet aircraft) so those should atill appear.
This would defenetly make sim more unique, and make it easier for strike aircraft to hide as their location on the radar won’t be as prompt as it is when the radar shows up on thr HUD.
Hi so with 20 mil cannon getting a buff in air battles and now the new destruction mechanics being added too planes is there any way for arcade bomber spawns too have their altitude spawns increased so fighters cant almost immediately intercept also could the gunners on bombers or tail gunners get increased range for firing too 2.0 km also for high tier bombers for the u.s could we possibly see the f117 nighthawk or the b2 spirit i know that these plane dont have any armament do fight other planes instead would it be possible too give them antilock capabilitys which would make it so that enemy pilots would have too use their main gun too destroy said aircraft
Thank you for taking the time too read this and i hope yall have a nice day
Italy is the designated home for minor axis vehicles, which Hungary falls under. Gaijin decided to add their postwar vehicles so they could make a sub tree out of them.