This is true, Im not sure what or even if they can get anything higher BR, but if anything that just makes it worse. Especially if you somehow consider Germany “neglected”
yeah I dont see this tree getting any better (It will probably stay like this forever) and I dont really care to be honest. Id rather have them add swedish ships than add some made up heli into the tree at this point.
6 Likes
Didn’t know that Germany had a helicopter that’s immune to all IR guided munitions with 15km+ missiles for years.
4 Likes
Germany had a helicopter with FnF missiles, which US and RU lacked for years.
1 Like
The Tiger UHT doesn’t even come close to the capability of the new US and RU helicopters. Sharing a guidance mode on the missiles doesn’t mean they’re anywhere close. That’s like saying a Roland is just as good as a VT-1.
1 Like
And US helicopters came even close to the capability of Tiger UHT ?
As crappy as the Pars3 are?
Yes pretty close.
1 Like
UHT was way better than anything US had before 64E.
Are you implying that I think it was okay for the tiger UHT to dominate when it came out?
complaints about PARS are the least of the complaints about the UHT.
its self defence capabilities are the highest on the list.
relevant complaints:
- missing extra Countermeasures
- missing LFK-NG
- missing 20mm 20m621 pylon mounted auto cannon
- no chin mounted gun turret
ofcourse the gun as never trialled on the UHT but it was made for it. the LFK-NG however was trialled and was ready. its a shorter ranged, smaller IRIS-T which should be added because the UHT cant defend itself against an enemy aircraft that wants to kill it.
plus it cant carry more than 4 so its not a TY-90 situation either
Why would the UHT get this before the AH-1Z gets AIM-9X?
Outboard 2x PARS is something that can be actioned without changing any status-quo in capability
1 Like
AH-1Z has the following:
- chin mounted turret gun for close range
- 30G Aim-9M for long range
- 120 CMs
- dedicated AAM pylon (6 total)
UHT has the following:
- no guns
- nerfed 13G stingers for ‘long range’
- 48 CMs
- no dedicated AAM pylon since irl it can carry rockets on the outer one (4 total)
oh and btw, i fully support the 1Z getting 9X ALONGSIDE the UHT getting LFK-NG. but UHT needs it pronto, since it has no other option
The AH-1Z still doesn’t have AAMs available on all six pylons, so it should have the priority of getting AIM-9Xs over others until that is fixed
Bruh i thought you turned over a new leaf but then you hit me with this…
Neither does ANY tiger.
This feature is apparently only for chinese helicopters and the rah66.
So no.
UHT maintains priority.
Not to mention… you gotta prove it CAN take the 9x on all 6 pylons.
It was proven 4-5 years ago with two separate reports, still hasn’t been implemented. Given that the old forum was nuked, finding the exact report with internet archive would be tedious, and it would still need to be reported again because of the devs stupid reasons that all the old reports need to be reported again on the new website, which is also impossible because the old reports used an exported restricted manual of the AH-1Z.
germany has pars,
look at sweden and japan
good for the 1Z then
I heard that China will get BM oplot, but what about bmp2 for Germany. Germany had BMP2