"Sky Odyssey" Update Trailer!

F-100D has FAR better missiles, better guns, and good FM.
MiG-19 has better missiles, better guns, and (afaik) also better FM.
MiG-12 has better missiles, better guns, and better FM.

All three are very commonly played aswell.

If the F-106 was moved to 9.7, it would be at the same BR as the T-2s with better FMs and leagues better missiles. Not to mention, T-2 gets rockets to use as flares.

There is absolutely no good reason for the F-106 to be raised.

1 Like

Now show me the air tree

Oh, right, it would be worse than Israel

I think that would be enough for you, it never starts from br 6 like Israel :D

Having ranks 1-3 doesn’t counteract the general lack of planes for the entirety of the tree

1 Like

youre literally wrong. lmao.
subtress always start with copypaste, nothing different if chile was chosen even if you want to cope otherwise.

also two of the jets if are the correct ones, are the f4 aup and A-7H which both are greek specific
and are unique.

Real brother, it makes me cry

1 Like

no they dont.

South Africa

1 Like

The speed alone is good enough reason. All Mach 2 capable fighters should be at 9.7 minimum that includes the Mig-21s and F-104s. I have never lost a gun fight to a Mig-21, Mig-19 or F-100 in an my F-106. The Mig-21 can barely keep up because while its falling I can still turn. Missiles are debatable, Aim-9B, R-3 and Aim-9E are practically the same thing and all of them are only useful in very specific situations same as the Aim-4.

1 Like

South Africa, the one and only good subtree

1 Like

thats the only exception?
other than south africa thats the case

lol

no

This tech tree is a draft tree, only made by Turkish players. This is not the case with the game being played. I have already realized that no matter what I tell you, you will do nothing but oppose it. I can’t waste my energy with you, have a good day.

@Smin1080p_WT

Dit you have time to check?

1 Like

For once im already going to argue this dumb statement.
But give me 5 vehicles of Greek origin. You would put it in the game instead for the Greek Subtree.

Your response will either be: Nothing.
or nothing.

Also, don’t give us “Oh, weh its copy paste” when Turkey uses nothing but copy-paste for their military. Almost all of your Main battle tanks are either M48s or M60’s.

1 Like

You are right, because I am opposed to adding more tech trees until the game itself improves and the existing nations get properly fleshed out.

Its not Gaijin’s fault that majority of today’s militaries use the same equipment, and these vehicles will help Israel a lot.

I’m sure you will call AIM-9 equipped Mirage F1 or F-4E with AIM-120 and GBU’s copy paste despite the changes these vehicles received from the original models.

3 copy-paste aircraft, 4 unique.
At least 1 unique ground vehicle.
TOR-M1 & OSA also give Israel SPAA options it otherwise does not have.

The fact your post claims the screenshots in your post are lying is deeply hilarious.
You posted them.
China isn’t a sub-tree.
& Finland is over half unique vehicles.

2 Likes

Purely USA’s choice to do so btw. Nothing more but consequences of their own actions. Same goes for Germany and other countries exporting their vehicles.

If only the BRs weren’t so compressed. Dealing with stuff like the Su-7 and the F-104 is absolutely no fun at 8.3/7.
That’s not even an “aw man, another uptier” problem, it’s at a point where I would just leave the game if the last few enemies are in sitting such planes.

idk if finland is over half unique, if you include air im pretty sure thats quite untrue

but yeah its needed

1 Like