The speed alone is good enough reason. All Mach 2 capable fighters should be at 9.7 minimum that includes the Mig-21s and F-104s. I have never lost a gun fight to a Mig-21, Mig-19 or F-100 in an my F-106. The Mig-21 can barely keep up because while its falling I can still turn. Missiles are debatable, Aim-9B, R-3 and Aim-9E are practically the same thing and all of them are only useful in very specific situations same as the Aim-4.
1 Like
South Africa, the one and only good subtree
1 Like
thats the only exception?
other than south africa thats the case
lol
no
This tech tree is a draft tree, only made by Turkish players. This is not the case with the game being played. I have already realized that no matter what I tell you, you will do nothing but oppose it. I can’t waste my energy with you, have a good day.
For once im already going to argue this dumb statement.
But give me 5 vehicles of Greek origin. You would put it in the game instead for the Greek Subtree.
Your response will either be: Nothing.
or nothing.
Also, don’t give us “Oh, weh its copy paste” when Turkey uses nothing but copy-paste for their military. Almost all of your Main battle tanks are either M48s or M60’s.
1 Like
You are right, because I am opposed to adding more tech trees until the game itself improves and the existing nations get properly fleshed out.
Its not Gaijin’s fault that majority of today’s militaries use the same equipment, and these vehicles will help Israel a lot.
I’m sure you will call AIM-9 equipped Mirage F1 or F-4E with AIM-120 and GBU’s copy paste despite the changes these vehicles received from the original models.
3 copy-paste aircraft, 4 unique.
At least 1 unique ground vehicle.
TOR-M1 & OSA also give Israel SPAA options it otherwise does not have.
The fact your post claims the screenshots in your post are lying is deeply hilarious.
You posted them.
China isn’t a sub-tree.
& Finland is over half unique vehicles.
2 Likes
Purely USA’s choice to do so btw. Nothing more but consequences of their own actions. Same goes for Germany and other countries exporting their vehicles.
If only the BRs weren’t so compressed. Dealing with stuff like the Su-7 and the F-104 is absolutely no fun at 8.3/7.
That’s not even an “aw man, another uptier” problem, it’s at a point where I would just leave the game if the last few enemies are in sitting such planes.
idk if finland is over half unique, if you include air im pretty sure thats quite untrue
but yeah its needed
1 Like
What 8.3s?
I get I have Canberra Mk6 & Sea Hawk bias, so I might be unaware of 8.3s genuinely having issues.
You will not be going Mach 2 in any of those.
You genuinely know nothing about how ARB is played.
“it’s British therefore it’s DOA”- Scimitar
2 Likes
I agree with you on this, of course, it’s driving me crazy that recently supersonic and subsonic planes have been playing the same matches. As I wrote in my first message, the maps at the top levels are small, tactical and strategic options are few, etc. I can’t play the high-end planes I want because I’m bored with missile soup.
well, i insist to defend my statement against your ‘‘dumber’’ statement. First of all, yeah, greece HARDLY has anything unique so you are proving my point here. We do not need copy paste vehicles anymore. Second, i will give you ‘‘its copy paste’’ thing since its copy paste? Last, yes, turkey uses m48 and m60 tanks as well as 2a4’s, mostly modernised. But besides that, we have one of the most unique light tank inventory in the region. Also we produce our own UNIQUE mbt, Altay. As you can see, you are offended over nothing; i didn’t said im unhappy with more vehicles getting added. Whatever man, waiting for a much ‘‘dumber’’ statement you have ;d.
You’re Greek, so obviously you’re going to defend your country, and that’s fine; it’s normal. I never mentioned Chile just now; besides, I’ve read other comments of yours and I don’t consider you a serious person, you only have to look at your username. Besides, you only have to read the other comments from people on the forum to realize that people aren’t happy with the full-copy sub-tree.
Still waiting for an answer to the question.