2.11. No politics
Gaijin does not endorse or support any political parties, groups, movements, organizations or committees, any companies, partnerships, corporations, or associations organized or maintained for political purposes, or candidates for political office, including in connection with any election, referendum, the proposed bill, or for any other political purpose whatsoever. Please keep this discussion about vehicles and not about ethnicity or politics and stay on topic
11 Likes
…
that is the worst choice possible
Agree, but more evidence are showing that gaijin try to do something for the gap in BR 10.0-11.7 french TT…
u know france is just getting the 2a4/5/6 from the neitherlands.
they aint getting any other leos
1 Like
singapore air force aerial refueler in moments of valor australia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiU9zIE_g7E
4 Likes
I would see Chile more in the subtree for Israel, the Chaffee and Sherman M-50 HVMS as well as a ship were passed to the developer, the Chilean navy and land and air force are made up of Israeli equipment, but Singapore could also be a solid candidate given the relationship that Singapore has with Israel
As a Chinese person, I agree with the Singaporean perspective. While there are minor cultural and historical links between our nations, using this as justification to forcibly merge the Singaporean tech tree with the Chinese tech tree is unreasonable. That said, if Singaporean vehicles were added to the Chinese tree, I wouldn’t oppose it outright—after all, many of us appreciate NATO-style weaponry (which, to be honest, NATO equipment does have aesthetic appeal).
However, I categorically oppose adding Singapore to the Japanese tech tree. While Thailand’s inclusion in the Japanese tree is historically justified (WWII to modern alliances), this logic does not apply to Singapore. Singapore would fit better under Israel or another nation, but never Japan.
My perspective:
- Singapore was never occupied by Japan during WWII, unlike Thailand, which collaborated with Axis powers.
- Post-independence, Singapore’s military partnerships lean toward Israel, the US, and Europe (e.g., Israeli-inspired SAR-21 rifle, German-designed submarines).
8 Likes
Singapore was occupied for 3 years during world war 2, this is an undisputed fact. The surrender was not only captured on film, it’s considered one of Britain’s greatest losses in the war.
I don’t mind Singapore as a Sub-Tree in China but i don’t see the need for it. China has a ton of so much domestic Vehicles of their own which could be added to the Tree instead of an Subtree or the Export-Slop / Copy-Paste all the time.
Why not finally fix Chinas MBTs and give them their Spall Liners and faster Reload? Folder ZTZ99B with 99A and WZ123A(Y) with WZ1001(E) LCT…ZTZ99-I, ZTZ96B, Type 85-II, ZTZ85-III, ZTZ-98 9910 and boom there you have a good High / Top Tier MBT Line Up entirely domestic - no need for Copy-Paste Slop or an Subtree. ZTQ15 as Top Tier Light Tank for Tech Tree instead we got the downgraded Export VT5 as a Squadron Vehicle.
Why not add the FK-2000, LD-35, Yitian, HQ-xy as Anti Air for China instead of Tor-M1 and then…another Tor-M1…there we would have entirely domestic and amazing Anti Air for China.
Why not add VN20 as Top Tier IFV? Or CM34? VN22? AFT10 as a nice and fun Top Tier ATGM Slinger?
BK1970/90, PLL09, SH11 as SPG’s and what not at all. And Taiwan has some Stuff too like CM34 or the D2 Prototype (Hunter Leopard)…
And those are just a few examples only for Ground…
Instead China always only gets Copy-Paste, downgraded Export’s and all the domestic Version are nerfed to the Ground
7 Likes
Hello from singapore.
personally, i think that the Singaporean sub tree shld be added to britain given we were colonised by them in the past.
Also i think it will be nice for the UK to have a Leopard 2
That’s the best way, but since the South Africa added to UK TT I think there already out of slot for any subtree
Maybe can add the Hunter AFV aft the Desert Warrior as UK needs a new top tier light tank.
The Leopard 2SG can be added to the Vickers Mk. 7 line.
Hello there, also a Singaporean Player and a UK Tech tree main. Although Singapore to the UK tech tree would kinda make sense it isn’t really that necessary since the UK already has very strong lineups where our vehicles would be.
1 Like
Then Id say prob israel shld get it but definitely not China.
1 Like
Why not though… it’s perfect for china
China does NOT need a bunch of western equipment
7 Likes
Neither does israel.
Are we deadass 💔💔💔💔
11 Likes
It’s one of the US’s closest allies militarily, the most prolific user of the eagles, falcons, and Skyhawks, and supplied with their equipment since the early 70s. It’s an independent nation tech tree, not a potential subtree for fricken China. If we were talking about a non western subtree for Israel then I agree, but it’s Israel which is more than deserving of the aircraft it used.
China does not need Leopard 2s, more F-16s, F-15s, or F-35s even. There would be nothing wrong with Israel which primarily uses western equipment getting even more western equipment.
9 Likes