FDPA isn’t exactly an alliance per se. Whilst yes it is the base of a defense agreement against external threats to Malaysia + Singapore, it really doesn’t hold anyone to anything past convening immediately to discuss the issue/threat/attack.
In practice, it’s likely that some form of aid would likely be rendered though.
Would make a really fun one tho tbf. The Turkey full TT is really appealing…
It’s got a bunch of unique vehicles and its own MBTs to boot. However I have a feeling the aviation tree would be lackluster to say the least…
turkey probably is better somewhere else
Israel and turkey don’t have the best relations rn
Im pretty sure thats the HISAR
If they really add Singapore to China they should bring back m1a1 aim and canadian leopard2 to British tech tree.
Why only China can have m1 and leopard2 sametime that’s unfair.
Actually i think they wannna add Leopard SG to french TT… (Oh lord
First, let the system know that I am speaking in English. This forum actually believes that Chinese is not a language。
那么他为什么不能加入中系子科技树那？
Eh i just want type 10 and leopard 2sg in a lineup
Nah if singapore goes to japan it means it gives RSAF aircraft to exist. I never made a singapore air tech tree for Israel is because basically most of singapore planes are copies of israel.
Plus the past is the past most Singaporeans don’t care if our country is gonna go to japan
I think this is a discussion that should at least be held elsewhere.
The topic is about subtrees. This is definitely not the place to bring politics.
2.11. No politics
Gaijin does not endorse or support any political parties, groups, movements, organizations or committees, any companies, partnerships, corporations, or associations organized or maintained for political purposes, or candidates for political office, including in connection with any election, referendum, the proposed bill, or for any other political purpose whatsoever. Please keep this discussion about vehicles and not about ethnicity or politics and stay on topic
…
that is the worst choice possible
Agree, but more evidence are showing that gaijin try to do something for the gap in BR 10.0-11.7 french TT…
u know france is just getting the 2a4/5/6 from the neitherlands.
they aint getting any other leos
singapore air force aerial refueler in moments of valor australia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiU9zIE_g7E
I would see Chile more in the subtree for Israel, the Chaffee and Sherman M-50 HVMS as well as a ship were passed to the developer, the Chilean navy and land and air force are made up of Israeli equipment, but Singapore could also be a solid candidate given the relationship that Singapore has with Israel
As a Chinese person, I agree with the Singaporean perspective. While there are minor cultural and historical links between our nations, using this as justification to forcibly merge the Singaporean tech tree with the Chinese tech tree is unreasonable. That said, if Singaporean vehicles were added to the Chinese tree, I wouldn’t oppose it outright—after all, many of us appreciate NATO-style weaponry (which, to be honest, NATO equipment does have aesthetic appeal).
However, I categorically oppose adding Singapore to the Japanese tech tree. While Thailand’s inclusion in the Japanese tree is historically justified (WWII to modern alliances), this logic does not apply to Singapore. Singapore would fit better under Israel or another nation, but never Japan.
My perspective:
