Should ZSL96 be given APDS and moved to 7.0~7.3?
I understand that right now it would fill the gap in the AA line, but TBH it’s the same situation as BTR-80.
Reasons to consider:
Slow horizontal and vertical drive just like BTR-80, not even faster than earlier AAs but had to deal with faster aircrafts
55 degree elevation, even worse than BTR-80’s 75 degree
Included a vote to see peoples’ thought.
It may not be a good idea to do that, I don’t know. I’d like to see peoples’ thought on this.
6 Likes
Still better than ZUT-37.
When you compared it with a 2.3, you validated my point. :)
5 Likes
Im not comparing it Im saying that some things that are SPAA’s are not good.
Saying something’s “better” than another one is not comparing, fine.
3 Likes
I think if you give at APDS you are going against the reason for its addition to the game.
Did it historically use APDS? If so, yes.
1 Like
i would like to suggest an interresting Chinese IFV for the chinese mid tier, the ZSL-92, also know under the name Type 92 The WZ 551 was at first presented in 1986 under the designation of Type 90 IFV. but the vehicles was refused to service because...
It was discussed before and people found information about it.
3 Likes
What are your reasoning behind this?
1 Like
64_bit
May 31, 2024, 7:36pm
10
Its an SPAA not a light tank.
If it’s for this reason, there are tons of counter examples. Gepard or in other words, the whole family of AAs that are using Oerlikon GDF. Not to even mention that Otomatic have APFSDS.
2 Likes
First, I’m sure you remember Wiesel 1A4.
Second, they have different chasis and differences in details like stablizer.
You are welcome to suggest a different BR than what I thought, but I no longer see you are against the idea.
After all, it doesn’t have to stay as AA, it can be a light tank. There have been so many changes like this in the past.
3 Likes
64_bit
May 31, 2024, 7:46pm
14
1st the Wiesel is not something I ever play against. 2nd We don’t need another half copy and paste BTR-80A. Why do China mains never appreciate what they have?
肘子方程式
May 31, 2024, 8:14pm
22
Obviously, it should be positioned in the game more of a Chinese-style BTR-80a at 7.3 than a 6.7 spaag
4 Likes
slowly give the plz83 130 an actual lineup
3 Likes
I really don’t want to see another 90s era vehicle in the Late WW2/Early Cold War Era. It should just be given better rounds and brought up.
4 Likes
I wonder though if they might intend to use the 92B as the chinese BTR-80A-like light tank.
It historically use APDS and never used AP
ZSL92 APDS report accepted
ZSL92 should have APDS // Gaijin.net // Issues
Now we need some one to make an issue for horizontal and vertical traverse speed, and bullet velocity from above reference.
3 Likes