Should the H-5 be renamed IL-28(China)?

CONTEXT: I’m not an expert but lately I’ve been researching skins for the H-5 so I can make a suggestion about them but reading the development and history of the bomber one thing that stood out to me was that it makes the distinction between the IL-28 operated by China and the H-5, the main cause of this was that China wanted to produce the beagle but the sino-soviet split happened and China opted for reverse-engineering and modifying the structure of the original aircraft which resulted in the H-5, in real life this led to a slightly better aircraft and this is where the differences start with the H-5 in-game:

Tail gunner turret:
Screenshot 2026-04-03 191327

one of the mentioned changes was the adoption of a different style turret, in this case from a Tu-16, in game this is not reflected and indeed this actually can be easily verified:

Spoiler

in-game:

Spoiler

shot 2026.04.03 17.52.43

Wrong engine name:
Screenshot 2026-04-03 195237

currently in game is labeled as the Klimov VK-1, yeah I know this is a small detail but it still is wrong

Extra cannon and wrong avionics/bombsight:
Screenshot 2026-04-03 195624

now this is pretty hard to even get a single proof of the avionics and is even harder to get info of the H-6 bombsight but the claim of the single cannon on the nose seems to be true:
Screenshot 2026-04-03 195137

this is a screeenshot from Bilibili but other pictures seem to show that the right side of the nose is missing the cannon and is just a smooth surface, so this suggests that indeed the H-5 in-game has an extra cannon…and for more proof the romanian H-5R also has only one cannon:

Spoiler

1937493

Cockpit is in russian:
pretty self explanatory, the H-5 is not an IL-28 it was produced by China for China so logically the instrument panel should be in Chinese not in Russian, I know that is not like it has a detailed cockpit but at least the text would have been nice

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Screenshot 2026-04-03 190642

the page also mentions that 110kg were reduced due to the change of the wing structure but I’m not sure how much this affects anything tbh, there’s also the mention of a drogue parachute but I couldn’t find a single image of where this parachute is or is it exclusive for one variant but a museum seems to have in display the parachute:

Spoiler

10445081

in conclusion I don’t know how many different variants there are or earlier models and later ones that exist but it seems like the “H-5” in-game is very wrong and should be just called IL-28(China) but I want to read everyone’s thought on this, the H-5 should be slightly better than IL-28 but in game both are the same which doesn’t do any justice to the history of the aircraft apparently, there are other differences mentioned but they are unrelated to the game, all of this claim come from the book [魏钢. 中国飞机全书[M]. 航空工业出版社, 2009.] but of course I can’t get it.

3 Likes

Because Gaijin don’t give a damn about bomber, and want to save as much money as possible
So, they probably just reused the Russian IL-28 cockpit.

We can see other examples in the Harrier I series cockpits.
AV-8A doesn’t have RWR, but we can see the RWR receiver in its detailed cockpit
Just like how we see Russian in the H-5 cockpit.

In fact, H-5 in War Thunder is a dead copy rip-off version of IL-28.

Only ONE THING that Gaijin put effort into H-5 was
Gelding Loadouts via the introduction of Chinese domestic bombs, which have less Weight-TNT-effectiveness.

When Other nation’s IL-28 can use 1-base loadout which gurnatees maximum reward per base (500kg x4).
H-5 cannot have a 1-base loadout because all of the conventional bombs have drastically less TNT than soviet counterparts do, while the Napalm loadout can destroy 2 bases with a single sortie.
While it cuts the reward per base into halve since a heavier loadout decreases the base reward multiplier, and needs to take a higher risk than normal IL-28 because if an H-5 pilot wants to have as much reward as IL-28 do, they need to get two bases per sortie, which means exposing them longer.

(with Yak-141 or F-5C theory, H-5 should’ve been able to use soviets bombs too. Technical compatibility… pff. not for H-5.)

5 Likes

gaijin always C&P,j6~j7e also has a large amount of Russian text

j6

Spoiler

j7

Spoiler

j7e

Spoiler

2 Likes

I just log in into the game and I just realized not only it has an extra cannon, in the real H-5 the cannon is on a whole different place, like come on…
shot 2026.04.03 21.05.37
Screenshot 2026-04-03 212236

it also mentions that H-5 still retained the pylons underneath the wings but I haven’t seen proof of this aside from the Navy variant that could use torpedoes on the wings

2 Likes

image

1 Like

I was referring to this, something like the IL-28ShB(I don’t remember the name) where you can take extra ordnance in the wings like rocket pods

2 Likes

I don’t know

From what I have seen rockets were never fitted to the H-5