Should the challenger 3 P replace the TD or be added separately?

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
1
  • Replace it
  • Add as a separate vehicle
0 voters

I thought this could be a good talking point since the challenger 3 P was recently unveiled

1 Like
2

We need to see if this new prototype get anything more on it

3

I’d say the new armor package is enough got it to be added, and Gaijin originally wanted to add the prototype but it ended up just being the TD they added

1 Like
4

It might get shown with add on armour and APS so just wait a bit

1 Like
5

If it only adds minor things, probably see it as a modificiation for the 3TD. (like the Gr1B mod was for teh Jag Gr1A) But if its meaningful/significant changes, then it should be a new tank

6

I think it should just replace it TBH, there’s no point in having 2 right?

7

honestly… i think UK needs it, but it would be nice to have as a seperate vehicle purely from a lineups based perspective.

separate addition pros:
+1 to lineup
separate addition cons:
+1 to grind

replace addition pros:
+1 to capability with no grind
replace addition cons:
-1 to lineups

8

Hope is a new car (real prototype)

9

What @Armen_Lozone said. UK needs more vehicles of this type, not a singular better vehicle. This game revolves either around crushing capability, or line-up capability. CR3 TD/P are neither crushing capability wise (like 2A7V/122 are), nor does the UK have the same line-up capability as Russia fx.

Better to keep the TD and then have the Prototype added down the line.

3 Likes
10

i wouldnt mind having both if theyre filed together.

dont forget will probably receive the cr3 production separate with another cr3 with modular armour

1 Like