Should EF2000s get AIM120C5?

You’re still completely missing it.

Same variables? They’re distinct metrics which all indicate the same conclusion.
Do feel free to refute them.
Simply saying that I’m interpreting them for the sake of my own argument conventionelly ignores that it doesn’t come from me; it comes from the data YOU posted.

I have turned raw data into interpretable results.
That’s what data science and analysis is.
And it all logically holds water, or does it not? Prove me wrong.

The arrow lands itself on the same conclusion. Time and time.

Prove me wrong.
Simply waving away my argument does not refute me, nor does it make it go away.
Perform your own analysis, match it against mine, and refute me. I’d be entertained.

They absolutely do, and I proved it.

If only.

Lol.
You’re not convicing anyone by trying to strawman or ad hominem me.
Do your own analysis, and prove me wrong.
I’m waiting. And very, very, very entertained.

Currently his arguments have more support than yours, just by the number of likes.

3 Likes

Yes

image
so um by your logic higher kda means better player. Then why is the ef2000 like 2% more WR then f15I from isreal despite the same kdr? How come a minor nation’s plane is performing worse then a major nation like germany? Is it perhapse a plane is better then the other one? I don’t know man or is every german air rb player just insainly good at the game? Idk how it works but if you play usa made planes do you just automatically become worse? As players is not stuck to playing 1 nation the whole time.

1 Like

I wouldn’t give likes much weight on a discussion. A popularity contest doesn’t mean much on who’s correct.

I’ve already told you your analysis wasnt really worth engaging with and why, then spent more time engaging with you and your points. I see no reason why Id waste any more of my time just to try and convince you. Feel free to disagree with the info ive provided all you want, the others can read whats been provided already and come to their own conclusions.

3 Likes

you are comparing a plane that has 7Mil games played to an 800k

Well no but you cant dismiss it either. Mythics argument sound more logical so he has my support.

3 Likes

Yet to see any evidence that isn’t entirely based off vibes

1 Like

Yes but by that logic shouldn’t the plane with 800k game played are being played by better players? Since 800k players are way less then 7mil, that means there is more “average” player to “good” player ration in the plane that have 7mil right?

yeah, you are right, but still do the comparison with the american one or people may not correlate to your logic.

Well youre unpopular AND incorrect so theres that

1 Like

One example is the f18 from sweden and usa
image
The sweadish one don’t even have hmd but perfrom way better because only dedicated swedish player plays it. Hence less player count.

that’s right but still.

I don’t want to get bashed as an usa main lol, so I use a obscure nation such as isreal to provide a stronger argument.

Because KDR != K/S.
You’re fundamentally understanding my argument here.
Kills per spawn indicate that Eurofighter players do, on average, more kills per SPAWN. That automatically excludes passive gameplay or KDR padding.
KDR does not mean much when you can simply steal a lucky kill or two, RTB, and J out.
Nor does correlation equals causation; less-played vehicles do not inherently mean more skilled players play it.

Refer to this:

of course this does not always work. In statistic there is the minimum significant data size. One counter example is this


I mean I guess british air player are just too good??? (I blame them for making my favourite plane the sea vixen 9.0)