im not a fond of such lineups, tho. Id better have some unique machinery here and there if there is a choice
so?
I mean. Who framed Roger Rabbit. Cool World. Ninja Turtles. X-Men. Road to El Dorado. Ultimate Ghostbusters. gee idk, i dont remember much of old animation now, but i certainly know that even back at 80s and 90s it was okay. Playboy had like at least 3 publications with 2d characters.
nah?
well, do we have a full livery with anime bo…s around? no we dont. But we sure as hell have anime decals which ARE okay for that logic, yes)
It was pointed out over the weekend the name was trademarked in the EU only, as opposed to their actual games like Active Matter which are trademarked in both US and EU jurisdictions. I think they just wanted to sell some overpriced tank packs on the store. Maybe in a year or so we’ll see a part 2 video and maybe some more tank packs, that’s likely the limit of their ambitions here.
3 Likes
ah. so. they just made it up for sole purpose of selling packs? man, that makes that even more miserable. Im really dissapointed rn.
2 Likes
you know if all of this wasn’t locked behind a $70 paywall I might have bought one for the tank and pfp but $70 for a goon pack nah man I’m out
1 Like
Huh ?
You liking 2d women and finding them beautiful is just you liking pixels that will never be a living creature.
Body pillows with anime girls exploit human need for physical contact, as it puts your beloved waifu consisting of 1s and 0s into something you can touch. That said, those things are extremely sad.
Yes we do now with Kate and company.
1 Like
That livery is directly dedicated to Kate, which is a fictional 2d character and having boobs in a bikini for a PFP is more than enough.
Having this in a game like WT can’t be excused.
3 Likes
Lol, cry more. What about the WW 2 pinup girls than?
5 Likes
But you just implied that this livery has anime boobs, not that it is dedicated to a fictional character.
Moving the goalpost too much?
God forbid, a w*man in swimsuit in my videogame.
West has fallen.
It can, and its going to stay.
5 Likes
Read my initial comment to him about liveries. Never said you need boobs on them.
Not being able to differentiate between 2d and 3d. Only one of those is and can be real.
West indeed has fallen.
It’s staying because some are willing to dish out enough money to buy AAA games, just to get some anime decals in a game that’s trying to sell itself as realistic.
5 Likes
why are there chud agarthan memes lmao
is this the shitpost central?
1 Like
no idea how to react to this
Doesn’t matter if they (Wargaming) have some contract or not, Gaijin creating their own IP to sell anime stuff shows that they likely don’t want to do collabs with actual anime IPs
I just didnt want to quote you fully, you never know when mods go trigger happy.
Anyway, I dont want to make further offtopic coments.
Point is, people are quite literally just yelling at clouds because the reality does not allign with their idea of “warrior culture” and what this game should be. Again, if anyone dislikes the anime stuff thats perfectly fine, but some of these people go beyond spouting nonsense.
And I just find it entertaining to attack those positions.
1 Like
Not gonna lie, at this point Gaijin probably should add another “stage” to the “Show content in the battle” setting that just disables all camos, decals and decorators except for:
- Basic camos (autumn/desert/winter/whatever)
- Very basic decals (flags/roundels/digits/victory marks/squadron markers)
- Military equipment decorators (guns/helmets/bushes)
2 Likes
One tier should be various military camouflages that actually look realistic and fit for battle.
Another tier should contain all the anime and flashy color nonsense.
Would that be different from hiding fictional? Is there anything specific that you had in mind that your concept would hide? I’m trying to think of a specific example but can’t think of one right now. Could you take a screen shot of one that you had in mind?
Like they grouped historical and semi historical recently, would bringing that distinction back be similar/same to what you are thinking?