Well Pero is name for antenna array, it’s just wasn’t fitted to anything at the end
Maybe it somehow can be placed on elements of N001 but there is no name for it, since probably it never appeared in complete radar station
Maybe it somehow can be placed on elements of N001 but there is no name for it, since probably it never appeared in complete radar station
The design competition of NIIP and NIIR produced these things and in the end nobody won the proposal cause the proposal dissapeared as China started J11B and J16 production. Some people said that China asked for improved avionics in 2003 and was granted upgrade of N001V.
Some suggests the PERO N001VEP version was mounted on a Su30MK2 prototype, never any proof given.
Internet is filled of such made up things, nothing of these is supported by NIIP book I have, I mean such things aren’t mentioned.
If that is the case why give Chinese mains the joke of the J-11A, you picked a fighter which you guys already knew would be mediocre and any attempt to get the aircraft replaced with the J-11B or other vehicles were immediately rejected or ignored.
The flight performance of the SU-27 was already bad, the SU-27SM at least has a good RWR and a decent radar going for it but this is completely otherwise for the J-11A.
4 Likes
anything else would have required effort
4 Likes
Noone’s getting PESA radars yet.
Pretty sure the Super Etendard already has a AESA radar if I recall.
Whar? The Agave? No?
Well that is when we said we wanted the later MLU upgrade, since those are supposed to get better CAS capabilities. However we failed to prove to GAIJING that there is a type of J11A called the MLU. GAIJING have no idea what radar it has so it is default to be the same as J11, despite not having any primary sources they still have the ability to reject everything.
1 Like
Don’t worry bro, the VT4A1 has got AESA radar as well for its hard kill APS.
1 Like
Is the J-11A using the SPO-15LM RWR a bug or is China top tier Air completely washed this patch?
1 Like
It’s not specific what exact RWR it uses, but they don’t really care. The helicopter RWR are still not fixed, they use same RWR as 1970s stuff even the Z10 which is made in 2010s.
2 Likes
How they don’t even bother to fix Chinese heli RWR just pisses me off.
4 Likes
At this point the J11A as a whole should have just been a rank IV mod for the J11 due to the very minimal visual model changes and net zero changes to avionics save a single new missile, much like the Jaguar GR1A had a GR1B modification in its upgrade tree. I’m just extremely, extremely disappointed with the aircraft, and frankly most of the aircraft this update tbh
It is the same BR as Su27SM for GRB, which is unacceptable with no guided weapons and no upsides really. I will make a separate thread.
1 Like
Perhaps I’m missing something on the N001VE, but datalink should be 1 because it can only datalink to 1 missile. It can guide 2 missile’s at once, 1 via datalink and the other with radar lock guidance for a SARH; which that would match the PPT’s claims of 1 datalink target. Do we have information that says otherwise, that N001VE can datalink, 2 ARH missiles at the same time?
not a bug. it’s like everyone kown it shouldn’t be SPO-15, you upgraded it with maws, why not bothering add a new rwr. but stil no source to proof it
1 Like
Honestly play the J8F and have fun, i’ve been doing that and i probably plan on skipping the J11A.
It doesn’t work that way.
If you launch more than one, one will always lose the datalink. Guidance methods for SARH missiles do not have any meaning for ARH missiles.
When the radar locks on to an enemy in STT mode, it provides a better datalink signal for ARH missiles, not mean ARH missiles receives radio reflections and guides to the target like SARH missiles.
In the first place, there is no ARH missile that behaves like a SARH missile other than the AIM-54 Phoenix.
You can guide a missile via datalink until the receiver comes within range to track the return from the hard lock, but any number of missiles fired would be guiding solely at the same target… and only one would be receiving the datalink information.
It’s weird they added a top plane for China two updates (three?) and just gimped it compared to its peers.
2 Likes