Same to J-11B
Is that a real picture? Looks off
Currently no evidence of additional pylons compare to J-11B, but it’s wing tip pylons are newly compatible with PL-10 (PL-8 remains available).
You will understand it if you know the official publicity department once blurred the R-73 training model on Su-30MKK for ‘secret keeping’. Nobody knows why.
Yep, I have the full version of 9000*5624 pixel and 86.48MB size, it’s just lightened.
3 Likes
Thanks, the lighting and contrast just looked a bit odd zoomed right in
6 fox3s?
yes
lol, I thought the j11bg would be a real ferrari, but in reality it’s going to be more like a kawa z1000, still pretty good though
is it aesa or pesa?
J-11BG? AESA.
China kinda just skipped PESAs.
2 Likes
Any info, or is it another J-16 situation?
Nope.
China keeps all their stuff super secret.
Still pretty nice :)
1 Like
Thanks. Someone posted the original further up the thread. Lighting and contrast just looked odd
1 Like
Rumors said J-11BG uses retired version of J-16 radar whose air-to-ground capability is below PLA’s demand, but I’ve never seen the original source.
The only comfired info is that it’s a J-11B equipped with WS-10B3 PL-10 PL-15.
Since we’ve got 3 top-tier Chinese jet with same radar data, J-11BG maybe a J-16 with same thrust, 1.5 tons lighter, less drag but fewer missiles.
1 Like
Do you think it would go in the J-11/J-15 line in the tree?
If it were to be added, that is
Does the J-11BG not have a twin launcher like the J-15T?
Without doubt, just like F-15C GE. But whether it will be placed directly after J-11B or after J-15T, idk.
J-15T doesnt have twin launcher either, lmao
its just something gaijin made up for balance
1 Like