Its very obvious.


Its very obvious.


Ok thx
Just a question why add the dual rack on the J15T and not for the J16? I mean even the su30sm2 there isnt a clear picture of it carrying dual rack for the r-77-1´s and it was still added
Not a Question I could answer officially by any means, only guess.
Yeah its not your fault the devs are Bias
Also how is the IRST on this thing, Is it still a MiG-29 copy paste?
devs probably wanted to hit the 10x ARH mark on the J-15T which was only possible with the dual racks, unlike on the J-16 which can carry 10x ARH on single racks only
But there is dual rack for alot of aircraft that doesnt have a picture with it
That is my problem
well i cant really give a reason why they didnt give the J-16 the dual rack other than devs deemed 10x ARH good enough
Highly unlikely. I also have doubts that such a blurry picture would be accepted anyway.
Datamining shows they already played around with a similar twin pylon. Just no clue why the devs never put it on the dev server.
It’s could just be a pl10 on inner and pl12 on outer pylons
should be, but anti ground ammo are even more classified than AAMs.
here is a reference of related things.
Well atleast you could try.
Is there a clearer photo or a patent for these double racks? If not we’ll just need to pray for gaijin to give it to us like for eurofighters amraam double rack as well as su-35 double rack on non su-35 flankers or gold eagle quad rack to name a few, since missile count is one of the ways gaijin balances the planes.