IRL the difference between the SD-10 and the SD-10(A)/PL-12 is mostly only length and top speed iirc
ingame the missile is also called SD-10A and PL-12 so uhh idk what da point is here
IRL the difference between the SD-10 and the SD-10(A)/PL-12 is mostly only length and top speed iirc
ingame the missile is also called SD-10A and PL-12 so uhh idk what da point is here
I’m not going to get into an argument over this. I’ve used both missiles, and in my experience, the SD-10 is miles better than both the PL-12 and PL-12A.
I’ve launched them at Mach 2 and they still failed. I’ve tried at Mach 1 too. I can understand notching working to a certain extent, but I’ve kept the datalink active until the last 5 seconds and the missile still doesn’t do jack shit.
No matter what I try, the PL-12 and PL-12A just don’t work.
consult da sheet if in doubt but, since the PL-12´s havent been touched they should be accurate for now just dont trust the amraams as that sheet doesnt get updated until the changes are live i think
If those stats are correct, then the PL-12A is modeled incorrectly in the game. If the in-game stats are correct, then your data is wrong, dude.
where did the PL-12A come from
thing has no relation to the SD-10A/ PL-12 debate
My guy, the stats from that sheet are literally datamined from the game files…
to make things clear since there seems some confusion
SD-10: not ingame, predecessor of the SD-10A/PL-12
SD-10A/PL-12: the one we know, same missile
PL-12A: should be called PL-12AE and is a marketed upgrade of the PL-12 family
simplified
What you’re saying has nothing to do with the issue I’m talking about. My point is that the Chinese missiles are simply useless.
Community Bug Reporting System ([DEV] J-16 PL-8 Asymmetrical Mount)
Community Bug Reporting System ([DEV] J-16 TGP MFD Not Translated)
Community Bug Reporting System ([DEV] J-16 HMD Target Range Incorrect Units)
Well, these are close to my last J-16 reports for now. I only really had time to go over the MiG-35 and J-16 (primarly J-16) this dev server. I’ll skim over secondary sources etc. later to see if there’s anything historical that may be reportable but I seriously doubt it.
i was thinking about to report that it uses the wrong HMD alltogether now that we got a proper chinese HMD for the JH-7, J11 and J15
I do really hope they switch it, and it has already been reported. But if they want to keep the TARGO for now to give the J-10C and J-16 a more “modern” feeling HMD the least they can do is fix the issues it has. Accurate units and a box for locks would be a good start, and take 5 minutes to implement.
do you have the report?
Found one but this is really odd, not accepted but seen, but also not a bug? What does further review mean?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yq564wW3738G
maybe considered
i think it is best to make a new report
Is there any chance of getting this report accepted?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ScdCGIW51Xgi
I want this more then the j16
the top picture is seen in this video
【【军迷之眼15】人民空军 飞行装具 专辑!头盔、头显、抗荷服…-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/3FQfoBD
Timestamp - 7:19
Im still looking for the second one