Does anyone know if China has a system similar to BOL?
i dont think so, they focus more on EW iirc
IIRC they did seem to have considered some sort of flare or chaff pod, as some non official sources mentioned but in the end they only ended up in larger aircrafts.
if Gaijin wanted to, they could give some jets BOL, since… its Gaijin as we know
I mean not if there is absolutely nothing IRL. The NATO jets prob can all get sth.
Su-33 can use a extra chaff pod irl, maybe j-15 can use something similar
1 Like
i just want my J-15T and J-16 asap icl, cant wait any longer
1 Like
Why dont we have it ? Considering that gaijin added late upgrade su33.
Is it on the wing tip or like on a normal pylon?
It would take up a normal r-27er pylon
Right. Also is it theoretically possible for aircrafts to launch the chaff rockets? Like S8PMs?
i wouldnt be surprised if we see the S-8-PM
Can the J11B carry more missiles?
you mean like more than 6 ARH? if yes, no
sadly not
su-35 for china will fix that hopefully, and maybe they will adopt the dual PL-12 pylon for the J-15/16 if they do
there were no dual pylons seen on the J´s afaik so probably not
Currently, publicly known information indicates that the J-11 can only carry a 2+2 configuration of FOX-3 missiles under its wings. Only the J-15/J-16 can carry two additional FOX-3 missiles, achieving 3+3 configuration (furthermore, based on the pylons used, it is speculated that the J-15/J-16, like the Su-30, can deploy FOX-3 missiles on the outer underwing stations) achieving 4+4.
If there is a desire to enhance the J-11’s payload capacity, Gaijin could consider adapting the ventral twin FOX-3 pylon from the J-10C for use on the J-11, as this pylon is similar to the ventral twin FOX-3 pylons used on aircraft like the Su-27SM and Su-30 .
Since there is no evidence that the Su-27SM can use the ventral twin FOX-3 pylon of the Su-30, there is reason to believe that the J-11/15/16 could also use the ventral twin missile pylon of the J-10C.
5 Likes