Yup, this one.
There a like paper mock up, i dont have it with me right now but i will send it when i find it.
1 Like
4 Likes
Totally won’t gonna break the wings, trust
Nahhhh, its fine.
I’m pretty sure this is an unofficial model, with only unconfirmed rumors saying it was official (no proof has been sent)
Its just a mock up / fun future upgrade.
We dont even know if the flankers from china can take double rails missiles.
Each missile is like 250kg. Flanker wing can take 3 fab 500 or 1 fab1500 with 1 fab 500.
I think each wing can support like 2.2 ton.
There is also other things to consider outside of sheer weight of the ordnance.
They haven’t been part of the discussion at any point, he has issues with the MKM getting KH-38 which is completely unrelated to Chinese flankers with non existent dual pylons.
1 Like
Most likely they are possible but PLAAF doesn’t think it’s necessary at this point.
I don’t disagree but I still dont think it should be added based of speculation
i mean the form factor is not square like usual, it’s widened quite a bit
isn’t it like j-10/j-20 dual pylons are same and unified for usage on all of the plaaf aircrafts? at least i read something like that on baidu
even the most ambitious j-16 renders don’t have any arh missiles on the outer pylons.
i mean like that’s what I’ve noticed, that any j-16 pic specifically don’t have fox 3s on that pylon, like that pic
typical chinese flankers having 8 fox3 in the most advance flankers
On the contrary, I do not have any objections to SU30MKM carrying KH38. You can refer to my previous comments on the forum. I strongly support modern fighter jets that do not have as much information about them. In the game, it is entirely reasonable to infer their mounting capabilities, whether it is MKM KH38 or EF2000 SPICE. However, this treatment should not be limited to MKM and EF2000, but should be treated equally for all aircraft
1 Like