That’s cool to know, if tought the JEFF had a fixed Radar, thanks for the information
is it mentioned that it has a swash plate or has high azimuth coverage ? , su35 has an azimuth coverage of ±120*
no, we have to do some assume
iirc search azimuth is ±125* n track is ±120* right ?
yeah. in wt you’re gonna be mostly in tws so ±125 most of the time
1 Like
almost every radar in game has that parameters, most notably the kfir c.10 blk.60 yet in game it doesn’t have those numbers. it means nothing
ACM range is limited by both ‘‘acmLock-distance-maxvalue’’ and ''setRadarHmdLockMode-setDistGatePos-pos±width/2".
new flanker images dropped
j-10b with ws-10 better flight performance than j-10c then?
I think the max range here is the max range of tracking targets after you locked them. So let’s say if you locked someone at 19 km via your HMD and he flew away to 25 km he is still being locked after the change.
1 Like
In the air battle between India and Pakistan on May 7th, the Indians did not realize that they were shot down from a distance of over 200 kilometers. Are you still arrogantly tasked? Are Chinese products from ten years ago and new products developed in recent years, such as PL17 and PL21, a waste product that benchmarks Russia and European and American countries? Ten years ago, products made the US and the West appear panicked. I just want to know what gave you blind and arrogant confidence!
The J-10B is only a strictly validated model, equipped with AVIC’s self-developed avionics and engine products, but it still cannot meet the requirements of the Chinese military, which is why a new J-10C model was developed!
I have no means of saying there is an issue with the range of PL-15 being more than 200km, just that chemically making missiles similar in sizes to go twice as far; plus the actual range of the battle was 120-150km.
The range of PL-15E is simply of an export model which is what I am stating, however I am stating that it has just 140km range is in fact from the Chinese air show.
Could talk over private messages cause u seem to be using translation from … mandarin?
1 Like
The military products sold by China are always within the framework of international law and never labeled with real data. Only the buyer and seller know the real data, so both you and I are guessing, and my reasons for guessing are more sufficient. I understand the style of doing things in my own country! The self use version of PL15 in China has a range of at least 250± And this year’s PL17 is roughly around 350±, PL21 and PLX are all within the signal range of the new early warning aircraft search radar, and the new early warning radar can reach 1300km±! Of course, these data can be found on the Internet in China! This is not a secret! Real data will only have larger numerical values! This is a consistent practice of China’s military industry exports!
This game is international, with players from multiple countries and regions around the world. For Chinese players, gaijin has created China’s technology tree. We can all accept it if we don’t go too far. After all, this is a game, a real war that never dies! No matter what purpose gaijn has for treating Chinese players so arrogantly! We don’t care how unreal the game content is! The Chinese often say that it is a mule or a horse. Take it out for a walk! After all, mules cannot run horses, and the real thing doesn’t need to be said with words! The authenticity of weapons can be seen in the struggles of war!
i doubt the 200km range unless china sold them the normal variant of PL15 , i thought only PL-15E was sold to pakistan. (it was more likely around 100-150km).
also idk how accurate this image is but here PL-15 is stated to have a range of 180-190km.
1 Like
In unknown conditions, could be 2 mach launch in space.
This chart originates from a public presentation several years ago by Sun Cong, the chief designer of both the J-15 and J-35. The data within it has been declassified and sanitized, meaning it can only qualitatively illustrate the relative performance of the PL-12, PL-15, and PL-16 missiles, and should not be treated as precise figures.