Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

I prefer by far to play a PL5EII which is the fastest FOX 2 in the game and which has a more solid IRCCM from the front than an R73 which can be lured in a dogfight at less than 1km in rear lock, not all dogfights are spinning and we have plenty of opportunities to plan a FOX 2 which is not TVC, but after
this is my recentie via my gamplay I prefer a solid FOX 2 which has a hit probability of 90% than a FOX 2 THC has a probability of 60%, I had a lot more misses with the R73 and that PL5EII

I would wait for the PL10 to have a viable THC missile

Except that is not what the picture shows.

The pylon you are claiming can carry a PL-12 in this picture is empty.

2 Likes

I’m aware of that now, no need to point it out anymore.
It’s 6x PL-12s max

1 Like

PL-8B with the new motor should take that title, wait for later dev servers ig

5 Likes

IMG_6583
IMG_6582
IMG_6584

Some details regarding the J-16’s AESA radar.

Firse image is the rough arrangement of the radar (on the left is the front of the radar)

Second image is how much the radar flexes/changes shape under acceleration/aircraft maneuvers, and also the forces acting on it.

Third image is a close-up of the transmit/recieve modules

1 Like

I’ve also posted this before, this is the flat antenna.
J-16AESA



Leaving this here as well, clear photo of Type 1492 radar on a J-8F (?), the predecessor to 1493 on the J-11B.

You can even see that the antenna is made by the 14th Institute based in Nanjing through the writing, produced in 2010

J-11B_radar
1493, the current x-ray is definitely a placeholder for the J-11B.

3 Likes

Alright, copy and paste of the j8f radar will still be a good radar

1493 should be much better than 1492.
1492 and 1493 both have 6 datalink channel for Fox 3 missiles, but 1493 has much more power and subsequently, more range.

1 Like

Why does the 1492 have 6 datalink channels if it only has 2 fox 3s?

What is this question…

I dont feel like this needs a legitimate answer vro

1 Like

I mean, it would take extra resources+money+manwork in general for dtalink channels that are never gonna be used. So what’s the point?

image
image

I mean, the radar could have been originally designed for use in other aircraft as well, just that it never got the chance to be fielded on anything other than J-8F.

According to SAC, the WS-10B’s thrust is up 12% over the WS-10A – around 144kN.
By the way, I never heard something called WS10D in China lol.

It’s a fan/unofficial designation for the engine that was fitted to later batch of J-16.
It was known that early J-16 used WS-10A, but later batch had notably different engine nozzle and was more similar to what we know is on WS-10B, but since WS-10B’s oil cooler position is off to the side, like AL-31FN, WS-10D was given to what we think is WS-10B but for the Flanker platform, aka different oil cooler.

It should perform the same as WS-10B otherwise.

J-16 never used WS-10A but WS-10B with 2 different nozzles.
The early version (same nozzle as J-10C)
b5af2b4e65eb3dbf624acfa51f66ffbc
cb3a0280bad809fea2243b7f49164472
The late version

Was WS-10B ready in 2015-2016? That was when J-16 reached IOC.

Yeah. A paper from SAC in 2013 specifically mentioned a 12% thrust increase for the WS-10B.

I remember WS-10D is the ultimate WS-10 for J-20, which has even more thrust, used as WS-15’s substitute before it’s ready