because it’s turretless and 100% more like a typical tank destroyer than light tank
and because their low ammo count, it deserves ammo crate more than anything else
i mean, just do it, like you did to M18 and centauro
5 Likes
All the vehicels you mentioned in this post are light tanks. The centauro neither the m18 are classed as tank destroyers.
2 Likes
both are historically tank destroyer
1 Like
Fiat 6614’s ammo count is what, 27? It’s fine.
The T106 however, is not. I think it should get ammo crates but retain its light tank classification, like they gave the ASU-57 scouting and whatnot.
2 Likes
17 according to wt wiki
If they get TD class, they will lose scouting I prefer to have it instead of additional ammo.
1 Like
TD can get scouting
ASU-57
ASU-85
3 Likes
As well as the M50 and M56.
On the other hand does the M18 get scouting when it was actually a TD by its role.
So having no armor seems like the requirement for a vehicle to have scouting 😂
Rank 1 light talks don’t even get scouting, even when they were literally scout vehicles 🙃
Which is the second most stupid change to Rank 1 after the removal of HE rounds.
Like, for real, just make a freaking tutorial on how HE shells work, if you are so worried that new players will somehow not understand when to use them…
1 Like
True, though in the same way R3 can get additional ammo feature without the need to change its class (other light tanks with a few ammo could too, like some atgm-carriers).
17 is still fine.
It have annoyed me a lot that you can’t scout with them
it’s not, i’ve tested it for 600 match and it’s not enough
Unless it’s the ELC BIS in which case it’s classed incorrectly as TD nad also gets no scouting.
Yeah I guess since you can be immune in a hull down position, but I don’t have that many matches in it.
ELC Bis being a TD and having no scouting is a crime.
it isnt, people are just too dumb to bring some HE shell to 1-shot me
1 Like
ELC AMX is correctly classed, documents state its chasseur de chars