Nah komrad you need to leak classified documents for that to happen
YES BMPT NERF!
I wasn’t expecting the bug report on the Flankers to be only 17 days old, considering Abrams reports have been ignored for 2 years now. The Gaijin situation is crazy.
1 Like
My av-8b na turns quite well, I was keeping up with an F-5E and then I did this neat trick where I went into hover mode and he couldn’t turn in enough then he ate an Aim-9L
And they are underperforming like crazy.
There is a reason why IRL the Sea Harrier FRS1 absolutely destroyed F-5Es in 1v1 dogfights but in-game its the reverse.
| Harrier 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribute | In-game Figure | Expected IRL Figure | Associated Bug Report | Additional comment |
| ITR (with 60% nozzle) (Deg/sec) | 15.3 | 19 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| STR (Deg/sec) | 11 | 14.6 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| TWR (At Mach 0.8)* | 0.61 | 0.9 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Combat Climb (Ft/min) | 16,000 | 24,000 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Max AOA at low speed (Deg) | 40 | 50+ | Community Bug Reporting System | Report only Partially fixed. Some sources indicate 70-90 degree AOA is possible |
| Coefficient of lift (at 200kts) | 0.95 | 1.5 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Top Speed at 84% Throttle @ 30k ft (Mach) | 0.94 | 0.98 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Pegasus Overheat (°C) | 730 | 794 | Community Bug Reporting System | Source is currently under dispute. So Report may not be possible at this time. |
| Fuel Flow at 84% throttle (Lb/min) | 110 | 210 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Breaking stop decelration by100 knots (Seconds) | 22.8 | 3.3 | Community Bug Reporting System | VIFF currently provides no breaking force at all |
| VIFF RCS (Knots) | 120 | 400+ | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| G at Buffet (@ M0.7) | 5.55 | 6.75 | Community Bug Reporting System | |
| Wing Loading (kg/m²) | 582.96 | 388.64 | same as above | F-104 is around 600 |
| * Estimated from Harrier 2 sources | ||||
| Misc Issues | ||||
| Harrier (All) Reduced IR Signature | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| Sooty Exhaust | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| (FRS1/FA2) Missing CCRP Symbology | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| (FRS1) Missing radar gunsight | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| (FA2) Missing twin Stores Carrier | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| (FRS1) Wrong HUD | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| (FA2) BOL & Twin Sidewinders | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| Incorrect fuel dump Minimum | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| Landing gear travel time | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| AN/ALE-40 Single fire | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| Extreme Flap Drag | Community Bug Reporting System | |||
| Incorect Flap Deployment | Community Bug Reporting System |
Harrier 1s =/= Harrier IIs.
Harrier 1s should probably perform more like the Harrier IIs do, and the Harrier IIs should perform even better.
F-5s have 2-3 deg/sec too much STR. Harriers have 2-3 deg/sec too little. They should litereally swap their current STRs. This is also not factoring the fact that VIFF actually isnt modeled. It doesnt actually do 99% of what it should due to game limitations.
The F-5 eating a 9L though shows a clear skill issue on the part of the F-5. That should have been an easy 1 flare defeat
9 Likes
Typical soviet main
1 Like
Ooh now the insults?
I wish you had shown some of this love to the MiG-29 as well. You know, it essentially being a miniaturized Flanker and all.
The change was based on Su-27SK manuals
Not Mig-29 manuals which say it is fine
I hate having the spike on the Namer or the MMP on the jaguar standing in the air all the time… The protective box is just there… They could animate it by just pressing the laser button kinnd of like the bradley
There are flanker reports made years ago
Lol, matter of fact the flanker has always had it’s Flight performance wrongly modeled and even with this latest change its still wrong
now im wondering, does this buff include Su-30MKK?
cool it with insults mate
2 Likes
The most external ammo belt/storage of history.
Seriously, thats just a hoax. And no tech mod or community mod says anything about it. When these shells detonate, the interior including crew isn’t combatworthy anymore. Thats obvious. There is no seperation between the turret / ammo and combat compartment. And thats what you see on quite some Telegram or X vids. BMPT suffers exactly the same catastrophic ammo detionations as the other T tanks with ammo storage under the turret and charges all around.
@Smin1080p_WT hey, quick question, sorry if you’re the wrong person for this
Is there any plans from the dev team to actually explain how the exposed ammo belt inside the tank is considered external and has access to a blow-out rack that seems to comes out from where the crew is seated in the hull?
It seems weird there’s all this controversy for this but for some reason it just seems to be getting ignored and they just went around the issue with this “nerf”
Maybe there’s a realistic reason for this to be the current situation but a lack of answers and these work-arounds just isn’t putting out any fires
Just fanning the flames, especially when it comes to people thinking it’s bias and a pay to win when it comes to the premium variant
PLZ FIX THE GBU´s
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1vaXx9PreDA9
They did atleast forward a report on it to the devs now, so ig we’ll see how it goes.
1 Like
Mig-29 is in the abyss.
MIG-29 FULCRUM BUFF WHEN GAIJIN!? IT’S BEEN Y E A R S!
5 Likes