The problem is that usually people look up at what planes are a higher br with better performance and then justify a certain plane to be lower (not saying you did that, just generally). Instead we should look at what planes with worse performance are at the same br and then adjust upwards
Don’t worry you’ll get to farm F-4Cs and F105s ((((((
Agree with it. Bought the F1C, J35XS, F20A (12->12.7) and they are absulutely useless now. They nerfed the Mig23ML for obvious reasons but its now a flying trashcan. Where was the poll about the br change anyway?
1 Like
There was no poll, only “statistics”
Not exactly, if you look at the chart 12.0 is essentially the new 11.3, everything that was at 11.3 is moved to 12.0, everything that was underperforming at 11.3 or overperforming at 11.0 went to 11.7.
Problem is BR above 12.0 is essentially unchanged, so the massive compression on top tier still exist.
Also the F20A, it is essentially unchanged, since the new top tier is 13.7.
1 Like
Peak gaijin
->Announce changes
->receive overwhelmingly negative feed back and inputs what would actually improve the game
->ignore feed back and go ahead with the changes
->leave
holy based
45 Likes
Also dumb is that a F-4EJ Kai with 4x Aim-9L and 4x Aim-7F is 12.3 (Sim) with an awesome radar (F-16).
Also that is so dumb F-15A/J (13.0 Sim) with 4x Aim-9Ms and 4x Aim7-M are on the same Br like all F-16.
Gaijin, when you ask me nice, i will help you with balancing in top tier sim. At the moment it is like someone of your employees roll the dice and steamroll…
its imposible to play at sim whit 12.0 vs 13.7
True for sim, that was bad decision with BR bracket there.
The nerfed Mig23ML can easily out turn the mirage F1C. So logically the F1C should be 11.7? Staying on the example
1 Like
No longer. After the nerf Mig23 is absolute brick and my mirage F1 can beat mig with no problem in a dogfight. I know that sounds ridiculous but it is what it is.
F1 still has worse chassis than F4S tho.
1 Like
I feel like they should’ve given time for a second round of feedback before rushing to the final solution, I can wait one more week if needed, instead of getting this undercooked change.
3 Likes
Wait so hang on a minute. The Belgian F-16A is 13.3 presumably because its an F-16 frame and has 6x Aim-9M. So how come the Gripen A is at 13.0 with the same 6x Aim-9M, with the option for SARH missile, has HMS and a good flight performance? Seriously who decided that, what?
5 Likes
F-5E and F-5C at 11.0 is crazy.
This demonstrates how “well” the developers know their game. The F-5C is worse than the F-5E in everything, but for some reason it also got 11.0
4 Likes
Technically I think they made the worst update.
Didn’t checked each aircraft one by one to choose the right br for them, just used random number generator to do it.
3 Likes
Because Gaijin hate F16 now, just like they hate F104
(F104S-ASA at the same BR of tornado ADV)
Top comment for me yet.
I mean, I may get flak for this but I’ve enough stuff unlocked to see what I can abuse and what to avoid so I guess this may be omega cringy for a while lol
There’s not a single rotation where 12.0 is in the 13.7 bracket.
(At least will not be once the new rotations go live.)
This is why:
F5A is worse than F5E
F5E is worse than the F5E FCU (with python 3)
Everything else is going up by one BR, so as all the F5.
F5A is over performing in its BR, and needs to go up by one additional BR, I do agree, now it is 11.0
Then F5E should be at 11.3 cuz it’s better
And F5E FCU should be at 11.7, cuz it’s even better
Now here’s the problem, F5E FCU will be garbage at 11.7, so what does that tell you?
It tells you the BR is still too compressed, and needs more decompression!
3 Likes