Poor Roland…
But, great news for Swedish tech tree!
Good. Please fix the model next
2 Likes
Lmao ok bro… Spaa gets a buff cas players like PUT IT AT 11.7!!! meanwhile it’s been constantly smacked from orbit for years… Unbelievable
1 Like
Two more missiles. (25% more)
16 km search radar range compared to 12.
16 km tracking radar range compared to 10.
6.81 kg of tnt equivalent compared to 1.44.
6 meters of prozimity fuze range compared to 3.
80 degree of gun elevation compared to 70.
so when in the week are we getting the decompression anyways?
1 Like
The only really relevant point here is the explosive mass and in some situations the elevation.
BOLIDE is faster with 5G more so it’s much more manouverable than the ROLAND 3.
It’s unfair that flarakpz, xm975 have the same br as asrad after its elevation buff. Do you disagree with that?
It’s very important when planes at worst will be 8km away from you) The tnt comparison is even funnier. Asrad have ± fine missile, roland have almost useless missile.
1 Like
Yeh i do disagree that it should go up, the roland should be buff’d instead, how about instead of nerfing everything that’s good why do we bring everything else up to a similar level in the same BR bracket. The roland has an acknowledge bug report on its elevation being incorrect and should be able to look higher, that only leaves it missile handling which definitely needs changing!.
1 Like
Aren’t heavier missiles gonna slow down the turn rate??
Not necessarily, without getting into the scientific side of things the weight is only one factor, thrust vectoring engines can be a factor along with the size of the ailerons, how much the ailerons can turn at any given time, how much surface area they have in general…many more factors come into account. You could have a very lightweight missile without a thrust vectoring engine and tiny ailerons meaning it’s extremely fast in a straight line but turns poorly vs a big heavy missile which has a thrust vectoring engine, large ailerons to help with it’s turn rate and overall it’ll pull a much tighter turn to intercept a target but could potentially need a longer distance to reach the same maximum speed.
Finally, thanks.
It’s about turret and gun, not about missiles…
mistral isn’t much better than stinger
worse finAOA
worse IRCCM
worse warm-up time.
What really matters are these issues about stinger. UV/IR seeker that can lock target at 6.5km and improved maneuverability.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yUohrEMuQLna
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BtsaTZfQiANX
1 Like
No, it should have been 10.0 before, this makes it a 10.3
No. The others should go down
Its still missing its flare rejection too, another bug report from another age thats yet to be implemented
The only way this would be fair is to make the FlaRakPz and XM975 10.0. That I could agree with. They’re over-BR’d ever since the AA SACLOS missiles got ruined anyway.
Making the ASRAD-R 10.7 on the other hand would just kill it off, as there is no Swedish lineup from 10.7-11.3 and at 11.7 there is no reason to take the ASRAD over the ItO. And it’s not good enough compared to aircraft its facing to warrant 10.7 either.
1 Like
Could you pls roll back a brand new gearbox for BMP-2M, BPM-2 and BMP-1?
Its broken
Vehicle became even slower because of the extra gears . The fourth and fifth gears are the same. The sixth and seventh differ by ONE kmh. The eighth and ninth also differ by only one kilometer per hour
NEVER!
Thay will kill everything at 9.0
Except anything at 9.0 can mildly maneuver to dodge those missiles. I honestly feel more threatened by Stingers, Mistrals and HE-VT than I do by Roland 3s.
They’re great against helicopters and people who fly straight at the battlefield though.