Server Update 13.01.2026

IMG_1231

1 Like

Sorry! Russian sources are always correct in gaijins eyes. Who would even believe NATO sources except leaked information?

2 Likes

Hopefully they’re making new T-80Us (my sweet sweet baby the T-80U), and upgrading them like the T-90M2s would make them quite deadly adversaries

1 Like

Not even. You know how long the auto loader buffs have been back logged regardless have having vast amounts of sources?

It took 4-5 years for the fix to occur, which only happened after the rdflt / hstvl fixes, and after the implementation of the T58 into the game

1 Like

The T90M2 will be an absolute monster, Arena M, and with good reversion, I hope Russia presents it to us this year. I also hope that the new T80BVMs will be produced or modernized from the T80U platform, which has an absurd amount of composite armor. I have no idea why they used the T80B.

1 Like

Lower the price! Lower the price of making changes to a squadron

2 Likes

Because there were way more T-80Bs built than T-80Us. It’s like a 4:1 ratio

Edit: it isn’t like the increase in composite will matter. Anti-ERA rounds will punch through the front the exact same

1 Like

They used T-80BVs instead of U’s because they were deemed adequate for modern combat, and that’s why if they made a T-80UM it would be a monster.

Look at the variants of them already.

1 Like

Pretty sure the T80U has 1/3 or 1/2 better armor over the T-80B

1 Like

I don’t remember the exact number of each one that was manufactured, but why didn’t they upgrade the T80U to BVM as well? The T80BVM doesn’t have the new turret of the T80U; a T80BVM built on the T80U platform would be just as heavily armored as a T90M. If I’m not mistaken, the T80 was also considered an elite tank, which is why it wasn’t mass-produced.

Yes, the BV has 5 layers of composite armor on the chassis instead of 3, I think, like the T80B. Speaking of which, the T80BV would be a great 11.0 or 11.3, it should be in the game, but I don’t understand why Russia didn’t modernize the T80U to BVM as well. RedEffect even talked about it in a video, but I think they considered it still good at the time.



T80BVM with turret of T80U and Relikt: PERFEKTION

The T-80BV is in game.

If you look at the modifications, it literally gets a thermal, and ERA as the BV package.

image
T80BV has better hull armor 5 layers of composite armor, in game has only 3 the game miss this
image

1 Like

And now 11.3+ games are an hell beause of the bmpt, is truly fun to play in a light vehicle like the centauro right now.
Can’t just gaijin admit it was a mistake and remove it? you can’t balance it right now

1 Like

Yet it was implimented? Meanwhile many bug reports for NATO vehicles have been ignored by Gaijin.

3 Likes

I 1000% see the Russian bias all the time and believe its real. But you know what i also agree the T58 needs a up BR.

2 Likes

They always are they cant cope with the west

3 Likes

Totally understandable from the situation they are in.

2 Likes

Incorrect, constantly mayo tanks get buffs

1 Like